Walker v. State
Decision Date | 13 March 1930 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 142. |
Parties | WALKER v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Morgan County; W. W. Callahan, Judge.
Fred Walker was convicted of murder in the second degree, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Refusing instruction on self-defense pretermitting consideration of evidence held not error.
The following requested charges were refused to defendant:
4. "If the deceased made a sudden unprovoked, murderous attack upon defendant, the deceased at the time being armed with a deadly weapon, and in the act of effecting upon the defendant his murderous purpose, and after considering all the evidence in the case you find this to be true, then I charge you, the defendant was under no duty to retreat but had the right to stand his ground and to kill his assailant."
3.
6. "The burden is upon the State to prove to your satisfaction beyond all reasonable doubt, that the defendant in this case brought on the difficulty in which Wesley White was killed; and if the State has not done this, and you find from the evidence that defendant was placed in sudden peril of loss of life by deceased shooting at him with a pistol within shooting distance, and that there was no way of retreat open to defendant without increasing his peril, then I charge you that if defendant killed Wesley White under such circumstances, the killing was in self-defense, and you should acquit the defendant by your verdict."
O. Kyle, of Decatur, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant, on April 27, 1929, killed Wesley White by shooting him with a pistol, and on his trial was convicted of murder in the second degree, and, as a punishment for the offense, was sentenced to serve thirty-five years in the penitentiary.
The rencounter between the deceased and the defendant took place at night between 10 and 11 o'clock on the side of a public road on Wolf's Mountain in the eastern part of Morgan county, some two or three miles from the nearest habitation. The meeting of the parties at this place, so far as the evidence shows, was accidental, and aside from the defendant and the deceased, two persons were present and witnessed the difficulty. These were Miss Ruby Morrow, who accompanied the deceased in his car, and Lewis Gullion, who was with defendant in defendant's car.
Miss Morrow, who was introduced as a witness for the prosecution, to state the substance of her testimony, testified that deceased driving his car, accompanied by witness, approached the place of the difficulty going north, and drove to one side of the road for the purpose of turning the car, when they discovered that the brakes on the car were out of order, and deceased got out of the car to see what the trouble was, and after they had been there about ten minutes they saw the lights of the defendant's car approaching, to quote her language:
On cross-examination, this witness stated, among other things: That when defendant shot, White grabbed the witness with both hands and stood up for a little bit, then fell and died there. The evidence is without dispute that the weapon used by the defendant was a 38-caliber Smith & Wesson special.
Lewis Gullion, the other eyewitness, was offered by the defendant and testified in respect to what occurred at the place of the difficulty and immediately before: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sanders v. State
... ... order to save his own life and that in so doing he violated ... no law of the State; and in this connection presented ... evidence tending to sustain him in this insistence. As a ... result of the foregoing conflict in the evidence a jury ... question was, of course, presented. Walker v. State, ... 220 Ala. 544, 126 So. 848; Witherspoon v. State, 168 ... Ala. 87, 53 So. 271 ... There ... was no error in refusing charge No. 14. This type of charge ... has been referred to as a "supposition charge" and ... has been denounced as improper. Richardson v. State, ... ...
-
Smith v. State
...of the homicide for which defendant was being tried; therefore there was no error in its refusal. The recent case of Walker v. State, 220 Ala. 544, 126 So. 848, the rule of this charge and refused charge 5 as to instruction on the several elements of self-defense. Defendant urges that refus......
-
Sparks v. State, 6 Div. 572
...involved, and the statement alleged to have been made by him out of court. Pittman v. Calhoun, 231 Ala. 460, 165 So. 391; Walker v. State, 220 Ala. 544, 126 So. 848; Peoples Shoe Co. v. Skally, 196 Ala. 349, 71 So. 719; Burton v. State, 115 Ala. 1, 22 So. 585; Southern R. Co. v. Williams, 1......
-
Alabama Produce Co. v. Smith, 8 Div. 271.
... ... evidence tends to establish. Griel & Brother v. Marks, ... Fitzpatrick & Co., 51 Ala. 566; Walker v ... State, 220 Ala. 544, 548, 126 So. 848; Hammil v ... State, 90 Ala. 577, 581, 8 So. 380; Munkers v ... State, 87 Ala. 94, 98, 6 So. 357; ... ...