Walker v. State, 97-2497

Decision Date27 May 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-2497,97-2497
Citation710 So.2d 1029
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D1304 John Davis WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Andrew F. Rier, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Consuelo Maingot, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.



We reverse defendant's convictions and remand for a new trial on the basis of the prosecutor's comments. The prosecutor described the defendant as "repulsive", and argued to the jury that he "has the face of a liar" and that he treated his wife like a dog. When she cross examined defendant, the prosecutor derogatorily compared him to an actor/used car salesman in the movie "Cadillac Man."

These comments were entirely improper. They were offensive to any notion of a fair trial and require reversal. See Perez v. State, 689 So.2d 306, 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) ("Because our system treats persons on their own individual merits, it is always wrong to call witnesses or defendants names by citing them as examples of a criminal 'type' "); Duque v. State, 498 So.2d 1334, 1337 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Green v. State, 427 So.2d 1036, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA) ("It is improper in the prosecution of persons charged with a crime for the representative of the state to apply offensive epithets to defendants or their witnesses, and to engage in vituperative characterizations of them."), review denied, 438 So.2d 834 (Fla.1983); Jackson v. State, 421 So.2d 15, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Peterson v. State, 376 So.2d 1230, 1231-32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 642 (Fla.1980).

We find no merit in the evidentiary points on appeal.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Gomez v. State, 98-2180.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 1999
    ...note that this same prosecutor, Laura Stuzin, was recently admonished for similar improper comments during trial in Walker v. State, 710 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998),2 which resulted in this Court's reversal of that defendant's It is not solely the prosecutor who must be admonished here. T......
  • State v. McKnight, 97-2896
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 27, 1998

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT