Walker v. U.S., 98-2903
| Decision Date | 03 May 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 98-2903,98-2903 |
| Parties | Irene C. WALKER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Bert N. Darrow, Cabot, AR, argued (Roland E. Darrow II, on the brief), for Appellant.
Richard M. Pence, Jr., Little Rock, AR, argued (Paula J. Casey, U.S. Attorney, on the brief), for Appellee.
Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Irene C. Walker appeals from the district court 1 judgment against her in her Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit. For reversal, Walker argues the district court erred in finding she failed to timely file an administrative claim. We affirm.
On June 30, 1993, doctors at the Brooke Army Medical Center (Brooke) installed a prosthesis to Walker's left knee. On September 7, 1993, while doctors at Brooke were manipulating Walker's left leg, it broke. On March 13, 1996, Walker presented to the United States an administrative claim on Standard Form 95. Where the form requested the basis of Walker's claim, she described both the June 1993 knee operation and the September 1993 leg fracture. Elsewhere on the form, Walker gave September 7, 1993, as the date of the accident and the onset of her pain. Attached to the administrative claim were sixteen pages of medical records from her hospital stays relating to the knee operation and leg fracture.
On March 4, 1997, Walker brought this FTCA action against the United States, claiming its agents and employees at Brooke had committed medical malpractice while treating her left knee. Walker claimed the agents and employees committed malpractice by improperly sizing and installing the prosthesis; breaking her leg; and failing to diagnose, treat, and take "proper medical and surgical action" to correct the former errors. The district court determined it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear the claim after finding that the only claim presented in Walker's administrative claim concerned the September 1993 leg fracture; that the administrative claim was presented more than two years after Walker should have become aware of the leg fracture; and that Walker's FTCA suit therefore was barred by the FTCA's limitations provision.
For a district court to have jurisdiction over a claim in an FTCA suit, the claim must first have been presented to the appropriate federal agency, see 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a), within two years of when the claim accrued, see 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
T.L. ex rel. Ingram v. U.S.
...is a jurisdictional prerequisite. McCoy v. United States, 264 F.3d 792, 794 (8th Cir.2001) (citing Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 438 (8th Cir.1999) (per curiam)). We noted in Motley the conflicting precedent, but found it unnecessary to pursue the matter. 295 F.3d at We think it is......
-
Motley v. U.S.
...264 F.3d 792, 794 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 1909, 152 L.Ed.2d 820 (2002), citing Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 438 (8th Cir.1999). We need not resolve the split in circuit authority to decide this case. Applying the rule in Schmidt because it is more fav......
-
McCoy v. U.S., 00-1375
...jurisdictional prerequisite, since the FTCA acts as a waiver of the federal government's sovereign immunity. See Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 438 (8th Cir. The Supreme Court has held that an FTCA claim for medical malpractice accrues when a plaintiff becomes aware of his injury an......
-
Polak v. City of Omaha
...exhaustion requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). Allen v. United States, 590 F.3d 541, 544 (8th Cir. 2009) (quoting Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 438 (8th Cir.1999)). With respect to the claim against Laney in his official capacity for violation of Polak's constitutional rights, "[i]......
-
Mccoy v. United States: the Eighth Circuit Imposes Excessive Requirements in Administrative Claims and Fails to Apply the Continuous Treatment Doctrine to Properly Postpone a Claim's Accrual
...Government, even though the government did not compensate them as employees. Id. 258. See infra notes 260-75 and accompanying text. 259. 176 F.3d 437 (8th Cir. 1999). 260. Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 437-38 (8th Cir. 1999). 261. See Walker, 176 F.3d at 438 & n.1 (establishing Wal......
-
Mccoy v. United States: the Eighth Circuit Imposes Excessive Requirements in Administrative Claims and Fails to Apply the Continuous Treatment Doctrine to Properly Postpone a Claim's Accrual
...Government, even though the government did not compensate them as employees. Id. 258. See infra notes 260-75 and accompanying text. 259. 176 F.3d 437 (8th Cir. 1999). 260. Walker v. United States, 176 F.3d 437, 437-38 (8th Cir. 1999). 261. See Walker, 176 F.3d at 438 & n.1 (establishing Wal......