Wall v. T. J. B. Services, Inc.
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | QUILLIAN |
| Citation | Wall v. T. J. B. Services, Inc., 233 S.E.2d 810, 141 Ga.App. 437 (Ga. App. 1977) |
| Decision Date | 08 February 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 53292,No. 2,53292,2 |
| Parties | T. H. WALL, III v. T. J. B. SERVICES, INC |
Thomas Hylmon Wall, III, Warner Robins, for appellant.
Nixon & Nixon, John P. Nixon, Warner Robins, for appellee.
This was an action for a dispossessory warrant and an amount alleged to be due under a lease agreement. The trial court issued an order directing defendant to pay the amount of rent alleged to be due into the registry of the court. The defendant appeals. Held :
This order is not a final judgment. Code Ann. § 6-701 (). No certificate of immediate review was obtained from the trial court, nor was an application for interlocutory appeal filed with this court. This appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 2 (A), supra.
Appeal dismissed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Lockhart v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
... ... , Lockhart, was one of two drivers employed by one White to drive a truck for Lumber Transport, Inc. (hereinafter Lumber Transport) with whom White had a contract to furnish the drivers and [141 ... ...
-
J.A. Childs Const. Co. v. Gemini Const. Co., Inc.
...S.E.2d 605; Haldi v. Allen, 141 Ga.App. 414, 233 S.E.2d 478; Kristensen v. Kristensen, 238 Ga. 294, 232 S.E.2d 564; Wall v. T.J.B. Services, 141 Ga.App. 437, 233 S.E.2d 810. Appeal DEEN, P.J., concurs. SOGNIER, J., concurs in the judgment only. ...
-
Crymes v. Crymes
...appeal concern matters which are interlocutory in their nature and which present nothing for review at this time. Wall v. T. J. B. Services, 141 Ga.App. 437, 233 S.E.2d 810. Judgment DEEN, C. J., and CARLEY, J., concur. ...
- Wall v. T. J. B. Services, Inc.
-
Appellate Practice and Procedure - Roland F. L. Hall
...Id. at 24, 684 S.E.2d at 101. 6. Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc., 172 Ga. App. 115, 322 S.E.2d 108 (1984); Wall v. T.J.B. Servs., Inc., 141 Ga. App. 437, 233 S.E.2d 810 (1977). 7. Owens, 300 Ga. App. at 24, 684 S.E.2d at 101. 8. Id. 9. Id. at 24-25, 684 S.E.2d at 101. 10. Id. at 25, 684 S.E.......