Wallace v. State

Decision Date10 April 1987
PartiesJack WALLACE, et al. v. STATE of Alabama. 85-1179.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

William E. Bright, Jr., Birmingham, for appellants.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Thomas R. Allison, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

James K. Baker, City Atty., and David J. Vann and Ronald L. Stichweh of Carlton, Vann & Stichweh, Birmingham, for amicus curiae The City of Birmingham.

Carl E. Johnson of Bishop, Colvin & Johnson, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Jefferson County Board of Educ.

BEATTY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order entered by the Jefferson Probate Court denying appellants' petition to incorporate Center Point, Alabama, pursuant to Code of 1975, § 11-41-1.

Appellants are inhabitants of the unincorporated community of Center Point; they petitioned the probate court under § 11-41-1 seeking an order incorporating Center Point as a municipal corporation. By the last paragraph of their petition, appellants purported to challenge the constitutionality of § 11-41-1: "By filing this Petition to Incorporate a Municipality, the Petitioners are hereby challenging the constitutionality of Section 11-41-1 of the Code of Alabama (1975) as amended." No other parties were joined in the probate court proceeding. That court entered the following order denying appellants' petition:

"A Petition to incorporate a municipality known as Center Point, Alabama, having been presented to the Court, and the Court having reviewed same, is of the opinion, and it is so Ordered that the Petition be and hereby is denied as said territory to be incorporated is within three miles of the corporate limits of an existing City."

From the above order, appellants filed in the probate court a notice of appeal to this Court, naming the State of Alabama as appellee. In their notice of appeal, appellants noted that they were "questioning [the] constitutionality of Section 11-41-1 of Code of Alabama (1975) as amended." The probate court entered another order "granting" the appeal, and that court subsequently transmitted the notice of appeal to this Court. Apparently, this notice of appeal was served on the Attorney General, for that office has filed an appellee's brief with this Court.

The only ground argued as a basis for reversing the order entered below is appellants' contention that § 11-41-1 is constitutionally infirm. For the reasons set out below, this appeal is due to be dismissed.

The first problem concerns the jurisdiction of the probate court to adjudicate the constitutionality, vel non, of a state statute. Section 11-41-1 confers on the probate court the jurisdiction to entertain petitions to incorporate, such as the one filed by appellants in this case, and to enter an order pursuant thereto when the requirements of § 11-41-1 are shown to have been met. However, we have found no authority on which to base the conclusion that the probate court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the constitutionality of the very statute that conferred jurisdiction on that court to entertain the appellants' petition. See Constitution of Ala., Amend. No. 328, § 6.06, as amended by Amendment No. 364; and Code of 1975, § 12-13-1. The jurisdiction of the probate court is limited to the matters submitted to it by statute. Mosely v. Tuthill, 45 Ala. 621 (1871); McCaa v. Grant, 43 Ala. 262 (1869). Compare Broughton v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile, 476 So.2d 97 (Ala.1985). However, in order to present the constitutional issue to this Court, appellants must have raised that issue in a court below having the jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue.

This Court addressed this problem of jurisdiction in City of Homewood v. Caffee, 400 So.2d 375 (Ala.1981), and, most recently, in Ex parte Averyt, 487 So.2d 912 (Ala.1986), except that, in those cases, the question concerned the jurisdiction of a zoning board (Caffee ) and a personnel board (Averyt ) to entertain constitutional issues. We reiterate the rule applied in both of those cases:

"[I]f [appellants] ha[ve] valid claims not cognizable before the [probate court], [they] will likewise be precluded from litigating those claims to [this Court] on appeal. ..."

Caffee, 400 So.2d at 378; Averyt, 487 So.2d at 914. "In other words, [the probate court having denied their petition to incorporate], only by invoking the general jurisdiction of the circuit court, by way of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • American Legion Post No. 57 v. Leahey
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 1996
    ...HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, J., concur. 1 See Ala.Code 1975, § 6-6-227; Terry v. City of Decatur, 601 So.2d 949 (Ala.1992); Wallace v. State, 507 So.2d 466 (Ala.1987); Barger v. Barger, 410 So.2d 17 (Ala.1982). 2 Note also that for product liability actions, if the collateral source payor is ......
  • F.S. v. D.D. (Ex parte R.D.)
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • 12 Junio 2020
    ...matters submitted to it by statute.’ " AltaPointe Health Sys., Inc. v. Davis, 90 So. 3d 139, 154 (Ala. 2012) (quoting Wallace v. State, 507 So. 2d 466, 468 (Ala. 1987) ). See also Walton v. Walton, 256 Ala. 236, 237–38, 54 So. 2d 498, 499 (1951) ("The jurisdiction of the probate court to ac......
  • K.L.R. v. K.G.S.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • 9 Marzo 2018
    ...1224, 1227 (Ala. 2015) (quoting AltaPointe Health Sys., Inc. v. Davis, 90 So.3d 139, 154 (Ala. 2012), quoting in turn Wallace v. State, 507 So.2d 466, 468 (Ala. 1987) ); see also § 12–13–1(a), Ala. Code 1975 ("The probate court ... shall have original and general jurisdiction as to all othe......
  • Continental Eagle Corp. v. Mokrzycki
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 25 Noviembre 1992
    ...that had jurisdiction to adjudicate that issue." Docena Fire District v. Rucker, 564 So.2d 422, 424 (Ala.1990) (citing Wallace v. State, 507 So.2d 466 (Ala.1987)). See also Campbell v. Alabama Power Co., 567 So.2d 1222, 1225 (Ala.1990) (holding that issues not raised in the trial court may ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT