Waller v. Wood
Decision Date | 02 April 1885 |
Docket Number | 11,729 |
Citation | 101 Ind. 138 |
Parties | Waller v. Wood |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Steuben Circuit Court.
S. A Powers and G. B. Adams, for appellant.
J. A Woodhull and --- Brown, for appellee.
The appellee filed the following verified claim against the county:
This claim was allowed by the board of commissioners, and from such order the appellant, who was a taxpayer of the county and who felt aggrieved by the decision, appealed to the circuit court. The appeal, upon motion, was there dismissed, and here such ruling is assigned as error.
It is obvious that this claim was for services rendered as "health officer" of said county, under and by virtue of section 4993, R. S. 1881. This section is in these words:
By virtue of this section, a physician, who is selected by the county board of health as its secretary, is entitled to such compensation from the county treasury as such board may determine. This the appellant concedes, but insists that the authority to make such officer an allowance for such compensation is conferred upon the board of health, and not upon the board of commissioners, and as the allowance in this case was, therefore, unauthorized, any person interested and aggrieved might appeal therefrom under the general statute authorizing appeals from the board of commissioners. This position can not be maintained. The statute above recited does not confer any authority upon the board of health to make such allowance. It simply authorizes such board to determine the amount of compensation, and when determined the duty rests upon the board of commissioners to cause it to be paid out of the county treasury. This is done by an allowance upon which the auditor draws his warrant upon the treasurer. This is the usual mode, and the statute does not change it. If,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Forsyth v. City of Hammond
...396; City of Terre Haute v. Beach, 96 Ind. 143; City of Logansport v. La Rose, 99 Ind. 117; Strosser v. Ft. Wayne, 100 Ind. 447; Waller v. Wood, 101 Ind. 138; Platter v. Board, 103 Ind. 360, 2 N.E. Bunnell v. Board, 124 Ind. 1, 24 N.E. 370; Farley v. Board, 126 Ind. 469, 26 N.E. 174; Improv......
-
The Board of Commissioners of Vigo County v. Davis
... ... 1, 24 N.E. 370; Farley v. Board, etc., 126 ... Ind. 468, 26 N.E. 174; Platter v. Board, ... etc., 103 Ind. 360, 2 N.E. 544; Waller v ... Wood, 101 Ind. 138; Board, etc., v ... State, ex rel., 106 Ind. 270, 6 N.E. 623; ... Padgett v. State, 93 Ind. 396; ... ...
-
Bd. of Com'rs of Vigo Cnty. v. Davis
...Bunnell v. Board, 124 Ind. 1, 24 N. E. 370;Farley v. Board, 126 Ind. 468, 26 N. E. 174;Platter v. Board, 103 Ind. 360, 2 N. E. 544;Waller v. Wood, 101 Ind. 138;Board of Com'rs of Jackson Co. v. State, 106 Ind. 270, 6 N. E. 623;Padgett v. State, 93 Ind. 396;O'Boyle v. Shannon, 80 Ind. 159;Gr......
-
Farley v. Bd. of Comm'rs
...power, no appeal will lie. Padgett v. State, 93 Ind. 396, and cases there cited; Grusenmeyer v. City of Logansport, 76 Ind. 549;Waller v. Wood, 101 Ind. 138;Platter v. County of Elkhart, etc., 103 Ind. 360, 2 N. E. Rep. 544; Hanna v. Board, etc., 29 Ind. 170; O'Boyle v. Shannon, 80 Ind. 159......