Wallingford v. Western Union Tel. Co

Decision Date24 October 1898
CitationWallingford v. Western Union Tel. Co, 31 S.E. 275, 53 S.C. 410 (S.C. 1898)
PartiesWALLINGFORD et al. v. WESTERN UNION TEL. CO.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Telegraph Company—Damages—Pleading.

Plaintiff alleged that, by reason of defendants' failure to deliver a telegram containing an offer for a ear load of mules, he was forced to keep them for several months at great expense, and was forced to sell them at the end of that time for a certain sum, which was less than the offer. Held, that the complaint stated a cause of action.

Appeal from common pleas circuit court of Greenwood county; James Aldrich, Judge.

Action by Samuel Wallingford & Son against the Western Union Telegraph Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Giles & Magill, for appellant.

Wells, Ansel & Cothran, for appellees.

JONES, J. This action is for damages for failure to seasonably deliver a telegraphic message. The appeal is from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in that the damages alleged were not thedlrect and proximate result of the alleged failure to promptly deliver said message. It appears from the complaint that Samuel Wallingford and his son, S. L. Wallingford, are partners in the business of selling mules in Sheridan, Ind., and that the father resided at Greenwood, S. C. On the 27th day of December, 1895, the defendant corporation received from S. L. Wallingford, at Sheridan, Ind., and, for a consideration received, agreed to transmit and deliver to Samuel Wallingford, at Greenwood, S. C, the following message: "Shall I sell Simms & Wedham load for hundred, four months, six per cent.?"—meaning, "Shall I sell Simms & Wedham a car load of mules, consisting of thirty head, at $100 per head, on four months' time, at six per cent. interest." This message was received by the defendant's agent at Greenwood, S. C, on the 27th December, 1895, and, as alleged, the defendant carelessly and negligently failed todeliver same to Samuel Wallingford for more than a week thereafter. It appears also that plaintiffs would have sold the mules at the price named, but for the negligent failure to deliver the message within a reasonable time. The damages alleged were as follows: "(10) That by reason of the careless and negligent conduct of the defendant's agent, in failing to deliver said message to the said Sam Wallingford upon its receipt, or within a reasonable time after its receipt, at Greenwood, South Carolina, the plaintiffs were forced to keep said thirty head of mules for three months, at great expense and care to the plaintiffs, to wit, the sum of seven dollars per head per month, in feed and attention, and were forced to sell said thirty head of mules at the expiration of said three months at a great loss to the plaintiffs, to wit, at the price of seventy-seven and fifty one-hundredths dollars per head, making the total loss to the plaintiffs upon each head of the said thirty head of mules the sum of forty-three and fifty one-hundredths dollars; and thereby the plaintiffs have been damaged by the careless and negligent conduct of the defendant as aforesaid in the sum of thirteen...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • R. M. Hays & Bros. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 4, 1904
    ...of damages in one case. We therefore conclude that either the rule for the admeasurement of damages laid down in Wallingford v. Tel. Co., 53 S.C. 410, 31 S.E. 275, is erroneous, or the principle announced in the opinion Mr. Justice WOODS is wrong. The rule stated in Wallingford v. Tel. Co.,......
  • Lewis v. Western Union Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1900
    ... ... Withers, 3 ... Brev. 458; Hunt v. D'Orval, Dud, 180; ... Tappan v. Harwood, 2 Speer, 536; Pearson v ... Davis, 1 McMul. 37; Edgar v. Costello, 14 S.C ... 20; Sitton v. MacDonald, 25 S.C. 68; Bridger v ... Railroad Co., 32 S.C. 592, 10 S.E. 960; Wallingford ... v. Telegraph Co., 53 S.C. 410, 31 S.E. 275; Mack v ... Railroad Co., 52 S.C. 323, 29 S.E. 905, 40 L. R. A. 679 ... We will cite just a few of the many authorities outside of ... our state: Kennon v. Gilmer, 131 U.S. 21, 9 S.Ct ... 696, 33 L.Ed. 110; 1 Bigelow, Torts, § 19; Wood, Mayne, ... ...
  • Henry v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • April 28, 1913
    ... ... Western ... Union Telegraph Co., 18 Idaho, 389, 109 P. 910, 30 L. R ... A. (N. S.) 409, 423, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 55; Wallingford v ... Western Union Telegraph Co., 53 S.C. 410, 31 S.E. 275, ... 276; Hays v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 70 S.C ... 16, 48 S.E ... ...
  • Freeman v. Western Union Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 28, 1928
    ... ... caused by the negligence of the company, the loss of the ... employment is the proximate result of the negligence, and ... damage can be recovered. 37 Cyc. 1762; Simkins v. Western ... Union Telegraph Co., 97 S.C. 413, 81 S.E. 657; ... Wallingford v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 53 S.C ... 410, 31 S.E. 275; and 60 S.C. 201, 38 S.E. 443, 629; ... Lathan v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 75 S.C. 129, ... 55 S.E. 134 ...          The ... question as to whether the telegram in the case at bar is to ... be covered by the one or the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free