Wallis v. Maddox, 24304
| Decision Date | 21 September 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 24304,24304 |
| Citation | 157 S.E.2d 456,223 Ga. 626 |
| Parties | James W. WALLIS et al. v. Lester MADDOX, Chairman et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
C. C. Perkins, Carrollton, for appellants.
Jones, Bird & Howell, Peyton S. Hawes, Jr., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold Hill, Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred L. Evans, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arthur Howell, Atlanta, R. D. Tisinger, Tisinger & Tisinger, Carrollton, for appellees.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Under the decision in Hicks v. Maple Valley, Corp., 223 Ga. 577, 156 S.E.2d 904, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed since the appellants' brief fails to point out the places in the record showing this court to have jurisdiction of the appeal, the references to the record showing the errors specified, or the references necessary for a consideration thereof.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Bailey v. Smith
...the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. See Hicks v. Maple Valley Corporation, 223 Ga. 577, 156 S.E.2d 904; Wallis v. Maddox, 223 Ga. 626, 157 S.E.2d 456; Estes v. Perkins, Warden, 225 Ga. 268, 167 S.E.2d 588; Clark v. Perrin, 225 Ga. 571, 170 S.E.2d 236; Bassett v. Smith, 226 Ga. 10, ......
-
Law v. Smith
...here from the overruling of the writ of habeas corpus is affirmed. See Waters v. Arrendale, 223 Ga. 617, 157 S.E.2d 289; Wallis v. Maddox, 223 Ga. 626, 157 S.E.2d 456, and Benefield v. Benefield, 224 Ga. 208(5), 160 S.E.2d Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING ......
-
Bassett v. Smith
...or the references necessary for a consideration thereof. Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577, 156 S.E.2d 904; Wallis v. Maddox, 223 Ga. 626, 157 S.E.2d 456; Estes v. Perkins, 225 Ga. 268(2), 167 S.E.2d Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. ...
-
Clark v. Perrin, 25349
...and the judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed. Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577, 156 S.E.2d 904; Wallis v. Maddox, 223 Ga. 626, 157 S.E.2d 456. Judgment All the Justices concur. ...
Request a trial to view additional results