Wallis v. Secretary of Kansas Dept. of Human Resources, 55788
Decision Date | 26 October 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 55788,55788 |
Citation | 689 P.2d 787,236 Kan. 97 |
Parties | Vernon O. WALLIS, Kirby Vacuum Cleaner Co., Dodge City, Kansas, Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, State of Kansas, Appellant. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. Where the district court adopts the hearing officer's findings of fact in total, it is then limited by K.S.A. 44-710b(b) to considering questions of law.
2. Where the findings of the hearing officer and the Secretary of Human Resources are contrary to the evidence, it presents a question of law which is always open to review by the courts. In reviewing questions of law, the trial court may substitute its judgment for that of the agency, although ordinarily the court will give great deference to the agency's interpretation of the law.
3. An independent contractor is generally described as one who, in exercising an independent employment, contracts to do certain work according to his own methods, without being subject to the control of his employer, except as to the results or product of his work.
4. There can be no absolute rule for determining whether an individual is an independent contractor or an employee. It is the facts and circumstances in each case that determine whether one is an employee or an independent contractor.
5. The primary test used by the courts in determining whether the employer-employee relationship exists is whether the employer has the right of control and supervision over the work of the alleged employee, and the right to direct the manner in which the work is to be performed, as well as the result which is to be accomplished. It is not the actual interference or exercise of the control by the employer, but the existence of the right or authority to interfere or control, which renders one a servant rather than an independent contractor. Jones v. City of Dodge City, 194 Kan. 777, 402 P.2d 108 (1965).
H. Dean Cotton, Topeka, argued the cause and was on brief for appellant.
Eldon L. Ford, of Cosgrove, Webb & Oman, Topeka, argued the cause and was on brief for appellee.
This is an appeal from the District Court of Ford County. The trial judge reversed the findings and rulings of the Secretary of Human Resources and found certain persons selling vacuum cleaners were independent contractors rather than employees.
The plaintiff, Vernon O. Wallis (Wallis), is the proprietor of Kirby Vacuum Cleaner Co. (Kirby), Dodge City, Kansas. The Kansas Department of Human Resources (KDHR) conducted a hearing on December 21, 1981, to determine whether individuals who are dealers of Kirby Vacuum Cleaners were employees of Wallis or were independent contractors under K.S.A. 44-703(i)(1)(B) and K.S.A. 44-703(i)(3)(D). The hearing officer made findings of fact and determined that the dealers were employees and not independent contractors and that assessments of unemployment taxes made by the KDHR against plaintiff for such individuals were owed. Wallis requested a review by the Secretary of Human Resources (Secretary). The Secretary adopted the hearing officer's findings of fact and determined the individuals were employees of Wallis, not independent contractors.
Wallis petitioned for judicial review pursuant to K.S.A. 44-710b(b). The district court heard the matter on January 14, 1983, and issued a decision containing findings of fact and conclusions of law. The district court adopted the findings of fact of the hearing officer, and found the jurisdiction of the district court was confined to questions of law. The district court determined that the dealers were independent contractors, not employees under common law rules and statutory definitions, and accordingly abated the taxes collected.
The findings of fact adopted by the district court are:
After receiving the decision of the court dated January 27, 1983, but prior to the filing of the Journal Entry, KDHR filed a first Notice of Appeal on February 28, 1983. The Journal Entry was filed on May 9, 1983. On May 31, 1983, KDHR filed a second Notice of Appeal.
KDHR raises two issues:
1. Whether the district court applied the proper standard for a review of an administrative officer's findings of fact under K.S.A. 44-710b(b).
2. Whether the district court correctly determined the question of law based on the findings of fact.
The statutory provision granting judicial review of decisions rendered by the Secretary concerning tax assessments is K.S.A. 44-710b(b). The relevant part of the statute states that "In any proceeding under this subsection the findings of the secretary of human resources as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive and the jurisdiction of said court shall be confined to questions of law."
The only case in which this section of the statute has been mentioned is Wesley Medical Center v. McCain, 226 Kan. 263, 597 P.2d 1088 (1979). The case actually dealt with the constitutionality of the Kansas Employment Security Act. The court held the Act did not violate either the due process or equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States or ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.
...or control, which renders one a servant rather than an independent contractor. Id. at 1112 (citing Wallis v. Sec'y of Kan. Dept. of Human Res., 236 Kan. 97, 689 P.2d 787 (1984)). "Although the right of control test is the most important single consideration in determining the relationship, ......
-
Craig v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., Inc.
...Security Act, Workers Compensation Act, and negligence based on respondeat superior. See Wallis v. Secretary of Kans. Dept. of Human Resources, 236 Kan. 97, 102–03, 689 P.2d 787 (1984) (unemployment taxes); Knoble v. National Carriers, Inc., 212 Kan. 331, 332–33, 510 P.2d 1274 (1973) (worke......
-
Thomason v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
...right or authority to interfere or control, which renders one a servant rather than an independent contractor. Wallis v. Secretary of Kans. Dept. of Human Resources, 236 Kan. 97, Syl. ¶¶ 3, 5, 689 P.2d 787 249 Kan. at 64, 815 P.2d 1104. 4 Although the court has given careful consideration t......
-
City of Shawnee, Kan. v. AT & T CORP.
... 910 F. Supp. 1546 ... CITY OF SHAWNEE, KANSAS and City of Merriam, Kansas, Plaintiffs, ... AT ... Oregon Waste Systems v. Dept. of Env. Quality, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 114 S.Ct ... v. Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, 504 U.S. 353, 360, 112 S.Ct. 2019, 2024, 119 ... ...
-
Automobile leasing and the vicarious liability of lessors.
...or control, which renders one a servant rather than an independent contractor." E.g., Wallis v. Sec. of Kan. Dep't of Human Res., 689 P.2d 787, 792 (Kan. 1984). In a later case, the same court elaborated An independent contractor is defined as one who, in exercising an independent employmen......