Walls v. City of New York, Civ. No. 17852.
| Court | United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York) |
| Writing for the Court | Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, for defendant Compagnie Maritime Belge |
| Citation | 156 F. Supp. 3 |
| Parties | Pearlena WALLS, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK and Compagnie Maritime Belge, Defendants. |
| Docket Number | Civ. No. 17852. |
| Decision Date | 15 November 1957 |
156 F. Supp. 3
Pearlena WALLS, Plaintiff,
v.
The CITY OF NEW YORK and Compagnie Maritime Belge, Defendants.
Civ. No. 17852.
United States District Court E. D. New York.
November 15, 1957.
Sidney Sigelman, Staten Island, for plaintiff.
Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, for defendant Compagnie Maritime Belge.
Peter C. Brown, Corp. Counsel, New York City, for City of New York.
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves for an order remanding this case to the City Court of the City of New York, County of Richmond, on the ground that it was improperly removed to this court on the petition of the defendant Compagnie Maritime Belge. The defendant Compagnie Maritime Belge moves to transfer this case from this court to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on the ground of convenience.
The complaint in the action instituted by the plaintiff in the City Court alleges a common law action against both defendants for a maritime tort, to wit, that while plaintiff was a passenger on a ferryboat owned by the defendant The City of New York, on October 26, 1956, the said ferryboat and a vessel of the defendant Compagnie Maritime Belge collided, as a result of which the plaintiff sustained personal injuries and was damaged
After both defendants had been so served and on July 26, 1957, the defendant Compagnie...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State of New Jersey v. Moriarity, Civ. A. No. 262-64.
...159 F.Supp. 856 (D. Del.1958); Maurer v. International Typographical Union, 139 F.Supp. 337 (E.D.Pa., 1956); Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (D.C.1957); Breyman v. Pennsylvania, O. & D. R. Co., 38 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1930)., and proper alignment of parties, are relevant for present ......
-
Moss v. CALUMET PAVING COMPANY, No. IP 61-C-180
...corporation, a city, is a citizen of the state. City of Ysleta v. Canda, 67 F. 6, 7 (W.D.Texas Cir. 1895); Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (E.D.N.Y.1957); Siegel v. Detroit, Dep't of St. Rys., 52 F.Supp. 669 (E.D.Mich.1943); McGarry v. City of Bethlehem, 45 F.Supp. 385 (E.D.Pa.1942......
-
Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Civ. No. 18892.
...Universal Surety Co. v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C. D.S.D.1958, 157 F.Supp. 606; Walls v. City of New York, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1957, 156 F.Supp. 3; Maurer v. International Typographical Union, D.C.E.D.Pa.1956, 139 F.Supp. 337; Rodriguez v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., D.C.S.D.Cal.1954, 121 F.......
-
Nesti v. Rose Barge Lines, Inc., No. 70 C 2518.
...Crawford, supra; Hill, supra; Victorias Milling Co. v. Hugo Neu Corp., 196 F. Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1961); and Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (E.D. N.Y.1957). See generally Paduano v. Yamashita Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 F.Supp. 304 (E.D.N.Y.1954) aff'd 221 F.2d 615 (2nd Cir. 1955). ......
-
State of New Jersey v. Moriarity, Civ. A. No. 262-64.
...159 F.Supp. 856 (D. Del.1958); Maurer v. International Typographical Union, 139 F.Supp. 337 (E.D.Pa., 1956); Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (D.C.1957); Breyman v. Pennsylvania, O. & D. R. Co., 38 F.2d 209 (6th Cir. 1930)., and proper alignment of parties, are relevant for present ......
-
Moss v. CALUMET PAVING COMPANY, No. IP 61-C-180
...corporation, a city, is a citizen of the state. City of Ysleta v. Canda, 67 F. 6, 7 (W.D.Texas Cir. 1895); Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (E.D.N.Y.1957); Siegel v. Detroit, Dep't of St. Rys., 52 F.Supp. 669 (E.D.Mich.1943); McGarry v. City of Bethlehem, 45 F.Supp. 385 (E.D.Pa.1942......
-
Lorraine Motors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Civ. No. 18892.
...Universal Surety Co. v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Ins. Co., D.C. D.S.D.1958, 157 F.Supp. 606; Walls v. City of New York, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1957, 156 F.Supp. 3; Maurer v. International Typographical Union, D.C.E.D.Pa.1956, 139 F.Supp. 337; Rodriguez v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., D.C.S.D.Cal.1954, 121 F.......
-
Nesti v. Rose Barge Lines, Inc., No. 70 C 2518.
...Crawford, supra; Hill, supra; Victorias Milling Co. v. Hugo Neu Corp., 196 F. Supp. 64 (S.D.N.Y.1961); and Walls v. City of New York, 156 F.Supp. 3 (E.D. N.Y.1957). See generally Paduano v. Yamashita Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha, 120 F.Supp. 304 (E.D.N.Y.1954) aff'd 221 F.2d 615 (2nd Cir. 1955). ......