Walls v. Howard County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, 198
Decision Date | 09 November 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 198,198 |
Citation | 407 A.2d 778,44 Md.App. 168 |
Parties | Ruth WALLS v. HOWARD COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS, INC., et al. |
Court | Court of Special Appeals of Maryland |
Gerald A. Zimlin, Baltimore, for appellant.
Joseph B. Harris, Towson, for appellees.
Argued before LOWE, LISS and WEANT, JJ.
On February 14, 1977, the appellant, Ruth Walls, filed a claim for benefits against her employer and its insurer with the Workmen's Compensation Commission. The appellant claimed that she had sustained an injury to her left knee, which arose out of and in the course of her employment for the Howard County Association for Retarded Citizens, Inc., the appellee, on February 10, 1975. A hearing was held before the Commission on July 19, 1977, and by its Order dated August 15, 1977, the Commission found that the claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and therefore disallowed it. On August 23, 1977, an appeal from the Commission's decision was filed in the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The appeal was tried without a jury on January 18-19, 1979, and the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Commission was affirmed. It is from the superior court's decision that this appeal has been taken.
On appeal we are faced with one question: whether the appellant's claim for benefits was barred by the running of the two year statute of limitations contained in Maryland Code, Art. 101, § 39(a). Section 39(a) provides in pertinent part:
The appellant contends that although she failed to file a claim within two years from the date of the accident, her claim is nonetheless timely under § 39(a). She argues that the appellee's failure to file a report of the accident causing disability pursuant to § 38(b)-(c) tolls the running of the two year statute of limitations. Section 38(b)-(c) provides in pertinent part:
The record before us shows that the accident which caused the appellant's injury occurred on February 10, 1975. She immediately reported the accident to her supervisor thereby complying with § 38(a), which provides in pertinent part:
Thereafter the appellant was absent from work on the following dates: February 25-26, 1975; May 19-21, 26, 28-30, 1975; June 9-10, 1975; August 7-8, 15, 1975; she attributed this lost time to the injury sustained on February 10, 1975 and so notified the employer. As stated above the appellant filed a claim for benefits against the appellee with the Workmen's Compensation Commission on February 14, 1977. The appellee then filed its employer's report on April 18, 1977.
In finding that the appellee's filing of the employer's report on April 18, 1977 did not toll the two year statute of limitations contained in § 39(a), the trial court stated:
We disagree with the trial court's interpretation of the statutory provisions in question. In holding that "the employer must report the accident to the Commission Only where the employee is disabled for at least four days prior to ten days after the employee reports the accident to the employer," (emphasis added), the trial court misconstrued the underlying purpose of requiring an employer to file a report of an accident. Section 38(b) states in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howard County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc. v. Walls
...the Court of Special Appeals which reversed the judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City. Walls v. Howard County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc., 44 Md.App. 168, 407 A.2d 778 (1979). The employer filed a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. We shall affirm the judgm......
-
Asato v. Meadow Gold Dairies-Hawaii, DAIRIES-HAWAI
...statute. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, N.J. v. Smith, 596 S.W.2d 661 (Tex.Civ.App.1980); Walls v. Howard County Association for Retarded Citizens, 44 Md.App. 168, 407 A.2d 778 (1979); Meads v. General Motors Corp., 402 Mich. 540, 266 N.W.2d 146 We hold that the employers' failure to f......
-
Molony v. Shalom Et Benedictus, 1318
...to be filed until at least May 1, 1971. See Douglas v. American Oil Co., 235 Md. 4, 200 A.2d 57 (1964); Walls v. Howard Co. Ass'n, Retard. Cit., 44 Md.App. 168, 407 A.2d 778 (1979). Although both Mr. Close and Mrs. Hutchinson were aware of the accident, the injury, and, we presume, ultimate......