Walsh Trucking Co. v. Hackensack Meadowlands Dist. Const. Bd. of Appeals

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
Writing for the CourtBRODY
Citation240 N.J.Super. 525,573 A.2d 951
PartiesWALSH TRUCKING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS, Defendant-Respondent.
Decision Date19 April 1990

Page 525

240 N.J.Super. 525
573 A.2d 951
WALSH TRUCKING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF
APPEALS, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey,
Appellate Division.
Argued Feb. 26, 1990.
Decided April 19, 1990.

Page 526

William J. Wolf argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Bathgate, Wegener, Wouters & Neumann, attorneys; William J. Wolf, Lakewood, on the brief).

Eliaser Chaparro, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Atty. Gen., attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Atty. Gen., of counsel; Eliaser Chaparro, on the brief).

Before Judges BRODY and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRODY, J.A.D.

These two consolidated appeals arise from a decision by the Hackensack Meadowlands District Construction Board of Appeals (Board) affirming a joint administrative order issued by the Construction Official of the Township of North Bergen and the Deputy Chief Engineer for the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (Commission). The order directs plaintiff to augment the sprinkler system in a commercial building it leases in North Bergen. Plaintiff contended in its appeal to the Board that the existing sprinkler system[573 A.2d 952] is adequate and fully complies with all applicable building codes.

Plaintiff appealed the Board's adverse decision to the Law Division in an action in lieu of prerogative writs. The Law Division ruled that the Board was a state agency and therefore transferred the matter to this court to be heard under our authority to review the final decision of a state administrative agency. R. 2:2-3(a)(2). Plaintiff appeals from the order of transfer and from the Board's determination. We are satisfied that the Board is a local and not a state administrative agency and therefore we must transfer the matter back to the Law Division.

Page 527

North Bergen is one of the 14 municipalities in Bergen and Hudson Counties in which the Hackensack Meadowlands District (District) lies. The legislative purpose in creating the District was to provide for the orderly and environmentally sound reclamation and development of the meadowlands of the lower Hackensack River basin. N.J.S.A. 13:17-1. The Legislature established the Commission as "a political subdivision of the State," N.J.S.A. 13:17-5(a), to manage the affairs of the District, N.J.S.A. 13:17-6.

Responding to a different concern, the Legislature provided for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Town of Secaucus v. Hackensack Meadowlands Development Com'n
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 18 août 1993
    ...court, because the parties have not briefed the issue. See Walsh Trucking Co. v. Hackensack Meadowlands Dist. Constr. Bd. of Appeals, 240 N.J.Super. 525, 528 n. 1, 573 A.2d 951 2 In 1987, the only year for which evidence was presented regarding the fiscal impact of the compounding effect, S......
  • Dolan v. City of East Orange
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 30 janvier 1996
    ...Law Division of the Superior Court, under R. 4:69-1. See Walsh Trucking Co. v. Hackensack Meadowlands District Constr. Bd. of Appeals, 240 N.J.Super. 525, 526, 573 A.2d 951 (App.Div.1990). Likewise, judicial review of the actions of a municipality where there is no administrative appeal pro......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT