Walsh v. Clark County School Dist., 5106
| Decision Date | 04 November 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 5106,5106 |
| Citation | 82 Nev. 414,419 P.2d 774 |
| Parties | Richard Joseph WALSH, Individually, Margaret Ann Walsh, Individually, and Richard Joseph Walsh and Margaret Ann Walsh as the Surviving Parents, Legal Representatives and Heirs of Terrance Patrick Walsh, a Deceased Minor, Appellants, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, City of Las Vegas, Nevada, a Municipal Corporation, Clark County, Nevada, and Frederick Frye, Respondents. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Henry R. Gordon, Paul L. Larsen, Las Vegas, for appellants.
Harvey Dickerson, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Edward G. Marshall, Dist. Atty., and Robert L. Petroni, Deputy Dist. Atty., Las Vegas, for respondents.
The issue on this appeal is whether the Clark County School District, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, enjoyed governmental immunity from tort liability on March 7, 1965, when the cause of action precipitating this suit arose. 1 NRS 41.031, by which the legislature waived state immunity and that of its political subdivisions and consented to suit, became effective July 1, 1965. Since that law does not direct retrospective application (County of Clark v. Roosevelt Title Ins., 80 Nev. 530, 396 P.2d 844 (1964); State ex rel. Progress v. First District Judicial Court, 53 Nev. 386, 2 P.2d 129, 2 P.2d 1048 (1931); Wildes v. State, 43 Nev. 388, 187 P. 1002 (1920)), it may not be used to destroy governmental immunity in this case. We must decide the issue at hand on the law as it existed when the accident occurred.
1. The Nevada law regarding the rule of governmental immunity from tort liability was confused and uncertain before the enactment of NRS 41.031. The latest judicial expression before legislative abolition was Hardgrave v. State, 80 Nev. 74, 389 P.2d 294 (1964), where the rule of immunity was applied to defeat a suit against the State. Only nine months earlier, immunity was denied a county. Rice v. Clark County, 79 Nev. 253, 382 P.2d 605 (1963). When placed side by side those two decisions are difficult, if not impossible, to harmonize (see dissenting opinion Hardgrave v. State, supra) and we shall not attempt to do so here. We prefer the rationale of Rice v. Clark County, and the dissenting opinion of Hardgrave v. State, and hold that the Clark County School District did not enjoy immunity from tort liability when the present cause of action arose.
2. It is suggested that NRS 386.010(5) 2 distinguishes this case from Rice v. Clark County, in a material way. That statute provides: 'Each school district shall have the power to sue and may be sued, but this legislative declaration in no way constitutes a waiver of immunity to tort liability, express or otherwise.' That language does not create an immunity. Instead, it assumes the existence of an immunity which Rice v. Clark County in broad application declared nonexistent. Accordingly, we deem the statutory expression about immunity meaningless...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ohio Valley Contractors v. Board of Ed. of Wetzel County
...557 S.W.2d 232 (Mo.1977); Johnson v. Municipal University of Omaha, 184 Neb. 512, 169 N.W.2d 286 (1969); Walsh v. Clark County School District, 82 Nev. 414, 419 P.2d 774 (1966); Merrill v. City of Manchester, 114 N.H. 722, 332 A.2d 378 (1974); Willis v. Department of Conservation and Econom......
-
Evans v. Board of County Com'rs of El Paso County
...of Omaha, 184 Neb. 512, 169 N.W.2d 286 (1969), and Brown v. Omaha, 183 Neb. 430, 160 N.W.2d 805 (1968); Walsh v. Clark County School District, 82 Nev. 414, 419 P.2d 774, 775 (1966), and Rice v. Clark County, 79 Nev. 253, 382 P.2d 605 (1963); Willis v. Department of Conservation, 55 N.J. 534......
-
Sheley v. Board of Public Ed. for City of Savannah and Chatham County
...118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Nebraska-Johnson v. Municipal University of Omaha, 184 Neb. 512, 169 N.W.2d 286; Nevada-Walsh v. Clark County School Dist., 82 Nev. 414, 419 P.2d 774 (1966); New Jersey-Jackson v. Hankinson, 51 N.J. 230, 238 A.2d 685 But of greater concern to us, of course, is the sit......
-
Loughner v. Allegheny County
...v. Genesee County Auditor, 375 Mich. 1, 133 N.W.2d 190 (1965) (holding no governmental immunity for county); Walsh v. Clark County School District, 82 Nev. 414, 419 P.2d 774 (1966) (reaffirming Rice v. Clark County, 79 Nev. 253, 382 P.2d 605 (1963), which abrogated immunity); Stone v. Arizo......