Walsh v. Property Tax Appeal Bd.

Decision Date20 February 1998
Docket NumberNo. 83072,83072
Citation181 Ill.2d 228,692 N.E.2d 260,229 Ill.Dec. 487
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
Parties, 229 Ill.Dec. 487 Richard T. WALSH et al., Appellees, v. The PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD et al., Appellants.

Barbara J. Welsch, Pekin, for Barbara J. Welsch and Richard T. Walsh.

Justice HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court:

"His horse went dead, and his mule went lame,

And he lost six cows in a poker game;

Then a hurricane came on a summer day,

And blew the house where he lived away;

An earthquake came when that was gone,

And swallowed the land that the house stood on;

And then the tax collector came around,

And charged him up with the hole in the ground." 1

In this case we consider the practice of the tax collector, in the person of the Tazewell County board of review, of calculating assessed values for like properties on different bases: to wit, as a percentage of recent sales price as opposed to the so-called "mass appraisal method." Specifically, we allowed the instant petition for leave to appeal by plaintiffs Richard T. Walsh and Barbara J.

                [229 Ill.Dec. 488] Welsch (166 Ill.2d R. 315) to consider whether the appellate court erred in invalidating the revised assessment of plaintiffs' jointly owned Tazewell County property, known as the Herget House.  The appellate court held that the Tazewell County board of review violated the uniformity clause of the Illinois Constitution when it raised the assessed valuation of the Herget House, along with some 39 other properties, based upon the property's recent sales price when virtually all other parcels of property in the county were assessed using the mass appraisal method.  286 Ill.App.3d 895, 222 Ill.Dec. 286, 677 N.E.2d 489.   For the reasons expressed below, we affirm
                
BACKGROUND

To facilitate the uniformity of taxation compelled by article IX, section 4, of the Illinois Constitution 1970, the General Assembly has enacted the Property Tax Code to govern, inter alia, the basis upon which real property is valued for purposes of collecting property tax revenue. Ill. Const.1970, art. IX, § 4(a); 35 ILCS 200/1-1 et seq. (West 1996). The Property Tax Code provides that, in general assessment years, each assessor's office "shall actually view and determine as near as practicable the [fair cash] value of each property" as of January 1 of each general assessment year. 35 ILCS 200/9-155 (West 1996). Fair cash value is defined as "[t]he amount for which a property can be sold in the due course of business and trade, not under duress, between a willing buyer and a willing seller." 35 ILCS 200/1-50 (West 1996). Fair cash value is synonymous with fair market value and, as such, an arm's-length sales transaction is the best evidence thereof. Once fair cash value determinations are made, each property receives an assessed valuation based upon 33% of the fair cash value. 35 ILCS 200/9-155 (West 1996). General assessment years in counties with less than 3 million persons, such as Tazewell County, shall take place quadrennially. 35 ILCS 200/9-215 (West 1996).

Contrary to the Property Tax Code's mandate, there has not been an "actual viewing to determine the fair cash value" of any Tazewell County property since the 1957 general assessment year. In each ensuing general assessment year, Tazewell County has applied what is known as the "mass appraisal method" for determining the fair cash value for all Tazewell County properties. The mass appraisal method supplants fair cash valuations by on-site viewings with fair cash valuations based upon the assessment-sales ratio statistics compiled by the Illinois Department of Revenue, which are gathered for the entirely different purpose of equalizing assessments on an intercounty basis. See 35 ILCS 200/17-5 (West 1996). The Department of Revenue annually determines assessment-sales ratios for each county by comparing the fair cash value determinations of the local assessors with the value of properties as evidenced by, inter alia, an average of recent arm's-length sales prices in the county or township at issue. Simply put, the assessment-sales ratio is tantamount to an average rate of appreciation for a given township or county. The mass appraisal method of property assessment simply adds the Department of Revenue's sales-assessment ratios for the three years preceding the general assessment year to arrive at an average rate of appreciation for properties in the county. Each property therein is then assigned a new fair cash value equal to the previous assessed valuation multiplied by this factor.

In Tazewell County's Pekin Township, where the Herget House is located, the Department of Revenue's assessment-sales ratios totaled 11.7% for the three years preceding the 1992 general assessment year. Thus, the Pekin Township assessor, as in every other general assessment year since 1957, raised the fair cash value of Pekin Township properties by the sales-assessment ratio factor. As a result, the assessor increased the assessed valuation of the Herget House 11.7% to $40,850.

Plaintiffs did not contest the assessor's assessed valuation of the Herget House. Rather, various other Pekin residents complained to the Tazewell County board of review that the Herget House had been underassessed given its recent sales price of $355,000. Observing that the Property Tax Code sets the assessed value of property at 33% of fair cash value, they argued that the Herget House should have received an assessed value of $118,333, some $77,000 more than the Pekin assessor's $40,850 assessed valuation. 35 ILCS 200/9-155 (West 1996). In response to these complaints, the Tazewell County board of review exercised its statutory prerogative (35 ILCS 200/16-30 (West 1996)) and raised the assessed valuation of the Herget House and some 39 other properties in the vicinity to reflect 33% of the true fair cash value, as evidenced by their recent sales prices. Accordingly, the board of review raised the assessed value of the Herget House from $40,850 to $100,000, which raised the property tax bill from $3,830.46 to $9,441.40.

The plaintiffs appealed the revised assessment to the Property Tax Appeal Board, arguing that the revised assessment violated the uniformity clause of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 (Ill. Const.1970, art. IX, § 4(a)). Specifically, plaintiffs contended that basing the Herget House's assessed value on the true fair cash value as evidenced by its recent sales price resulted in the property's being taxed at a different proportion of its true value than Tazewell properties which had been assessed using the mass appraisal method. In support, the plaintiffs pointed to evidence that the assessed value of other Pekin Township properties recently sold ranged from 7% to 68% of their true fair cash value as indicated by their recent sales prices.

The Property Tax Appeal Board found that the plaintiffs had not shown by clear and convincing evidence that the Herget House had been overassessed or that the revised assessment violated the Illinois Constitution's uniformity clause or the United States Constitution's equal protection clause. In support, the Property Tax Appeal Board noted that the assessed value of the Herget House was slightly less than 33% of the fair cash value as evidenced by the sales price, and thus was not excessive. As for the constitutional arguments, the Property Tax Appeal Board found that neither the Illinois nor the United States Constitution was violated because the sales-assessment ratio for the Herget House, slightly lower than 33%, was well within the 7% to 68% range for other Pekin properties. Moreover, the Property Tax Appeal Board found plaintiffs' comparisons to other Tazewell County properties unpersuasive given the unique history, location and size of the Herget House.

The appellate court reversed, finding that the removal of the Herget House from the mass appraisal system of valuation violated the uniformity clause of the Illinois Constitution of 1970. In affirming the appellate court, we base our decision on the Illinois Constitution's uniformity clause, and thus do not reach the plaintiffs' arguments that the revised assessment also violated the United States Constitution's equal protection clause. 2

ANALYSIS

The Illinois property tax scheme is grounded in article IX, section 4, of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, which provides in pertinent part that real estate taxes "shall be levied uniformly by valuation ascertained as the General Assembly shall provide by law." Ill. Const.1970, art. IX, § 4(a). Uniformity requires equality in the burden of taxation. Kankakee County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 131 Ill.2d 1, 20, 136 Ill.Dec. 76, 544 N.E.2d 762 (1989). This, in turn, requires equality of taxation in proportion to the value of the property taxed. Apex Motor Fuel Co. v. Barrett, 20 Ill.2d 395, 401, 169 N.E.2d 769 (1960). Thus, taxing officials may not value the same kinds of properties within the same taxing boundary at different proportions of their true value. Kankakee...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • DW Data, Inc. v. C. Coakley Relocation Sys., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • June 25, 2013
    ...See United States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551, 93 S.Ct. 1713, 36 L.Ed.2d 528 (1973); Walsh v. Prop. Tax Appeal Bd., 181 Ill.2d 228, 229, 229 Ill.Dec. 487, 692 N.E.2d 260 (1998); Bloomington Public Schools, District No. 87, McLean County, Ill. v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Bd., 379 Il......
  • CNB Bank & Trust, N.A. v. Rosentreter
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 3, 2015
    ...between a willing seller and a willing buyer as being the best evidence of fair market value (Walsh v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 181 Ill.2d 228, 230, 229 Ill.Dec. 487, 692 N.E.2d 260 (1998) ), the supreme court surely had in mind two different persons. It is difficult to visualize the cont......
  • Rhone v. First Am. Title Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 17, 2010
    ...“the basis upon which real property is valued for purposes of collecting property tax revenue.” Walsh v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 181 Ill.2d 228, 230, 229 Ill.Dec. 487, 692 N.E.2d 260 (1998). The Tax Code provides that “the taxes upon property * * * shall be a prior and first lien on the ......
  • Cook County Bd. of Review v. PTAB, No. 1-00-1183
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 20, 2002
    ...by the Illinois Department of Revenue (the Department). The decision of our supreme court in Walsh v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 181 Ill.2d 228, 229 Ill.Dec. 487, 692 N.E.2d 260 (1998), is brief, clear and relevant to a consideration of the cases before us. Here are two excerpts that inform......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT