Walter Smith, John Carter, William Nicholls and Others, Survivors of Clement Smith, Deceased Plaintiffs In Error v. Dennis Condry

Decision Date01 January 1843
Citation42 U.S. 28,11 L.Ed. 35,1 How. 28
PartiesWALTER SMITH, JOHN CARTER, WILLIAM S. NICHOLLS AND OTHERS, SURVIVORS OF CLEMENT SMITH, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. DENNIS CONDRY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
72 cases
  • Canada Malting Co v. Paterson Steamships British Empire Grain Co v. Same Starnes v. Same
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 11 de abril de 1932
    ... ... its territory there can be no other law, Smith v. Condry, 1 How. 28, 33, 11 L. Ed. 35; Slater v ... Couch (D. C.) 40 F. 176; The Walter D. Wallet (D. C.) 66 F. 1011, 1013; The Lamington ... ...
  • Voda v. Cordis Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • 1 de fevereiro de 2007
    ... ... Waldrop. Of counsel was John A. Kenney, McAfee & Taft, of Oklahoma City, OK ... Ragosa ...         William C. Rooklidge, Howrey LLP, of Irvine, California, ... should examine these reasons along with others that are relevant in every case, especially if ... For example, in Smith v. Condry, 42 U.S. (1 How.) 28, 11 L.Ed. 35 ... made in Mexico between the Mexican plaintiffs and the Mexican subsidiary of AT & T. In Tschira ... ...
  • Hogge v. SS YORKMAR
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • 11 de março de 1977
    ... ... STEEL CORPORATION et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, ... George C. BAKER et al., Third-Party ... Supp. 719 David R. Owen, and William R. Dorsey, III, Baltimore, Md., for Bethlehem ... Brazil, deceased, claiming damages as the result of the death of ... was Benjamin Edelheit, and her pilot was John K. Sundling ...         6. It is ... the Coast Guard, the shipping industry and others. The only real responsibility placed upon the ... However, some failure or error (mechanical or human) resulted in the light's ... (7 Wall.) 53, 64, 19 L.Ed. 67 (1868); Smith v. Condry, 42 U.S. (1 How.) 28, 35-36, 11 L.Ed ... ...
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Brown
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 23 de dezembro de 1899
    ... ... 297] BATTLE, J ...          William ... M. Brown instituted this action against the ... But it is in error ... Actions for personal injuries are ... done. Carter v. Goode, 50 Ark. 155; ... Northern Pacific ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Choice of law and predictability of decisions in products liability cases.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 34 No. 5, October 2007
    • 1 de outubro de 2007
    ...and from a sort of moral necessity to do justice, in order that justice may be done to us in return." Id. at 34. (25.) Smith v. Condry, 42 U.S. 28, 33 (1843) ("The collision having taken place in the port of Liverpool, the rights of the parties depend upon the provisions of the British stat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT