Walters v. State, 6 Div. 3.
Decision Date | 23 June 1931 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 3. |
Citation | 24 Ala.App. 370,135 So. 600 |
Parties | WALTERS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; H. P. Heflin, Judge.
Bob Walters was convicted of robbery, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
R. M. Montgomery, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Thomas E. Knight, Jr., Atty Gen., for the State.
The offense charged in this case is robbery; the corpus delicti was fully proven by the evidence, and as to this there was no dispute or conflict.
The principal state witness was one G. W. Jackson, named in the indictment as the injured party. He testified in substance as follows:
Upon the trial of this case the paramount or controlling question was the identity of the person who committed the robbery complained of and about which there was no dispute. This appellant strenuously denied that he was the man. He admitted, however, that he was in the city of Birmingham and a guest of one of the leading hotels of the city on the night the crime was perpetrated. He testified his home was in Detroit, Mich., and that he was night manager in a certain business concern of that city. He explained his presence in the city of Birmingham by stating he was spending his vacation in said city and had driven from Detroit with one Fred Bridges, also stopping at the same hotel, and said Bridges was also arrested in connection...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State, 6 Div. 238
...impressed that in no instance did the court violate the permissive practice of the latitude given in cross examination. Walters v. State, 24 Ala.App. 370, 135 So. 600; Crain v. State, 166 Ala. 1, 52 So. Appellant admittedly killed his brother-in-law. The evidence for the State tended to sho......
-
Burks v. State
...are sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to the truth of the testimony of a witness.' Walters v. State, 24 Ala.App. 370, 373, 135 So. 600 (1931)." Jones v. State, 469 So.2d 713, 717 (Ala.Cr.App.1985). See also Hooper v. State, 585 So.2d 137 (Ala.1990) (prior in......
-
Connell v. State
...the camper. Evidence of flight of a defendant from the scene of the crime is admissible as a circumstance to show guilt. Walters v. State, 24 Ala.App. 370, 135 So. 600; McAllister v. State, 30 Ala.App. 366, 6 So.2d 32; Lance v. State, 28 Ala.App. 571, 190 So. 108; Alabama Digest, Volume 6, ......
-
C.D.B. v. State
...are sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to the truth of the testimony of a witness.” Walters v. State, 24 Ala.App. 370, 373, 135 So. 600 (1931). “ ‘ “The inconsistencies may impair the credibility of the witness and reduce the weight of the testimony, but they......