Ward v. Blythe
Decision Date | 08 November 1909 |
Citation | 122 S.W. 508,92 Ark. 208 |
Parties | WARD v. BLYTHE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cross Chancery Court; Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor.
Decree affirmed.
T. E Hare, for appellants.
When no objection is made to evidence, the complaint must be considered as amended to conform to it. 29 Ark. 323; 40 Ark 352.
John B Jones, for appellee.
A stipulation in a deed of trust that the contract shall be governed by the laws of some particular State is binding on the parties thereto, although executed in another State. 64 Ark. 39; 34 Miss. 181; 62 L. R. A. 45.
T. E Hare, in reply.
Only the maker, his vendees, assigns or creditors, can plead usury. 66 Ark. 125.
OPINION
T. S Blythe borrowed of H. C. Grigger $ 1,500, and in consideration thereof executed to him his note for $ 1,725 and ten per cent. per annum interest from maturity, the note being dated January 11, 1902, at Smithdale, Arkansas, and payable one year alter date at the First National Bank of Memphis, Tennessee. Blythe and his wife, Fannie M. Blythe, conveyed certain lands in the State of Arkansas to Joe Ward in trust to secure the payment of the note. In the deed of trust it was stipulated: "This contract embodied in this conveyance and the note secured hereby shall in all other respects be construed according to the laws of the State of Arkansas, where the same is made." The mortgage was duly acknowledged and filed for record on the 18th day of January, 1902. On the 24th day of October, 1902, Blythe sold and conveyed the land to O. N. Killough, and entered into the following agreement in writing as to such sale:
Ward and Grigger are citizens and residents of the State of Tennessee, and Blythe and his wife are citizens and residents of the State of Arkansas.
On the 24th day of August, 1903, Ward and Grigger brought suit on the note and deed of trust in the Cross Chancery Court against Blythe and his wife, and O. N. Killough and Blanche Killough, his wife, to foreclose the deed of trust. An answer was filed for Blythe,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cotton v. Mutual Aid Union
... ... appeal whether any answer was filed. Pembroke v ... Logan, 71 Ark. 364, 74 S.W. 297; Cribbs v ... Walker, 74 Ark. 104, 85 S.W. 244; Ward v ... Blythe, 92 Ark. 208, 122 S.W. 508 ... Under ... the record in this case, the only relationship that existed ... ...
-
Flanagan v. Ray
...83 Ark. 1; 80 Ark. 65. An action at law may be transferred to equity because of the equitable nature of the defense. 91 Ark. 464; Ward v. Blythe, 92 Ark. 208. No was saved to the order of transfer. 2. The demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained, as the description of the land w......
-
Hill v. Imboden
...Logan, 71 Ark. 364, 74 S. W. 297; Cribbs v. Walker, 74 Ark. 104, 85 S. W. 244; Hardie v. Bissell, 80 Ark. 74, 94 S. W. 611; Ward v. Blythe, 92 Ark. 208, 122 S. W. 508. It is next insisted that the claim for the lien was not filed within the time prescribed by the statute; that is to say, wi......
-
Hill v. Imboden
... ... Logan, 71 Ark. 364, 74 S.W ... 297; Cribbs v. Walker, 74 Ark. 104, 85 S.W ... 244; Hardie v. Bissell, 80 Ark. 74, 94 S.W ... 611; Ward v. Blythe, 92 Ark. 208, 122 S.W ... It is ... next insisted that the claim for the lien was not filed ... within the time ... ...