Ward v. Board of Equalization
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Burgess |
| Citation | Ward v. Board of Equalization, 135 Mo. 309, 36 S.W. 648 (Mo. 1896) |
| Decision Date | 30 June 1896 |
| Parties | WARD v. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF GENTRY COUNTY. |
Appeal from circuit court, Gentry county; C. A. Anthony, Judge.
Certiorari by George Ward to the board of equalization of Gentry county. Proceedings dismissed. Petitioner appeals. Affirmed.
C. H. S. Goodman and J. W. Sullinger, for appellant. W. F. Dalbey and McCullough & Peery, for respondent.
The petitioner sued out of the circuit court of Gentry county a writ of certiorari, directed to the board of equalization of that county, for the purpose of reviewing the record of said board in the matter of the assessment of the First National Bank of King City, in said county, in which said bank the petitioner, Ward, is a stockholder. On a hearing in the circuit court the proceedings were dismissed, and the petitioner appealed. By the writ, which was issued on the 27th day of October, 1893, the board was commanded to send up a transcript of the record of its proceedings, and also the original assessment list filed with the assessor by the cashier or chief officer of the bank.
The original assessment list called for in the writ is as follows:
The record of the board of equalization is as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Shelton
...100 Mo. 59, 13 S. W. 398; Railroad Co. v. Morton, 27 Mo. 317; Boren v. Welty, 4 Mo. 250). As was said by Burgess, J., in Ward v. Board, 135 Mo. 309, 36 S. W. 648: "It is well settled that the writ of certiorari only brings up the record, and only such matters as appear from the face thereof......
-
Bacon v. Ranson
... ... 196; Express Co ... v. St. Joseph, 66 Mo. 675; St. Joseph v ... Spiegel, 75 Mo. 145; Ward v. Board, 135 Mo ... 309, 36 S.W. 648; Mass. Bonding and Ins. Co. v ... Chorn, 274 Mo. 15, ... ...
-
The State ex rel. Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. Shelton
... ... However, ... when a record was brought into a superior court from an ... inferior court, board or officer after judgment, the question ... at once arose as to how far the superior court would ... Co. v. Young, 96 Mo. 39, 8 S.W. 776; Han. & St ... Joe R'y Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo ... 294; Snoddy v. County of Pettis, 45 Mo. 361; ... Rector v. Price, 1 Mo. 198]; ... Boren v. Welty, 4 Mo. 250.] ... As was ... said by Burgess, J., in Ward v. Board of ... Equalization, 135 Mo. 309, 36 S.W. 648: "It is well ... settled that the writ of ... ...
-
State ex rel. Shaw State Bank, a Corp. v. Pfeffle
... ... to support or overthrow it. [Hannibal & St. Joe R. Co. v ... State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294, 308; House ... v. Clinton County Court, 67 Mo. 522; Ward v. Board ... ...