Ward v. Com.

Decision Date05 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. 741101,741101
Citation216 Va. 177,217 S.E.2d 810
PartiesJohn Lewis WARD, Jr. v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record
CourtVirginia Supreme Court

John Dirffie Tyler, Richmond, for plaintiff in error.

Alan Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Andrew P. Miller, Atty. Gen., on brief), for defendant in error.

Before I'ANSON, C.J., and CARRICO, HARRISON, COCHRAN, HARMAN, POFF and COMPTON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted John Lewis Ward of voluntary manslaughter and fixed his punishment at three years in the penitentiary.

During an argument on November 26, 1973, Ward shot Benjamin Daniel in the head.Daniel remained in the hospital until his death on February 6, 1974.Dr. R. C. Henry, Medical Examiner for the City of Richmond, performed a post-mortem examination.His report listed six 'pathological diagnoses' and cited '(g)unshot wound of head' as the 'probable cause of death.'Dr. Henry died before Ward was brought to trial.

Over defendant's objection, the autopsy report was admitted into evidence; it was the only proof of the cause of death.

While autopsy reports and duly attested copies thereof are admissible in evidence was provided in Code§ 19.1--45 (Repl.Vol.1960), 1'only facts contained in the certificate are accorded the dignity of prima facie evidence.'Robertson v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 62, 67--8, 175 S.E.2d 260, 264(1970).Although signed by the decedent's attending physician, a statement in a death certificate concerning the cause of death 'was but the expression of an opinion' and 'was not, therefore, competent to show the cause of the decedent's death.'Edwards v. Jackson, 210 Va. 450, 453, 171 S.E.2d 854, 856(1970).We have only recently declined to extent the shopbook exception to the hearsay rule to 'include opinions and conclusions of physicians or others recorded in hospital records.'Neeley v. Johnson, 215 Va. 565, 571, 211 S.E.2d 100, 106(1975).

Dr. Henry's recorded statement was an expression of opinion and, standing alone, was incompetent to show the cause of Daniel's death.Since there was no other proof of the cause of death, we hold that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial if the Commonwealth be so advised.

Reversed and remanded.

1' § 19.1--45.Reports and records received as evidence.--Reports of investigations made by the Chief Medical Examiner or his assistants or by medical examiners, and the records and reports of autopsies made under...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
16 cases
  • Hopkins v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 27 Noviembre 1985
    ...to the rule excluding hearsay evidence. Bond v. Commonwealth, 226 Va. 534, 537, 311 S.E.2d 769, 771 (1984); Ward v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 177, 178, 217 S.E.2d 810, 811 (1975). The trial court erred, therefore, in admitting the evidence of Kagey's identification of the remains. We agree with......
  • Quintana v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 9 Septiembre 1982
    ...699, 700, 187 S.E.2d 188, 189 (1972). But an opinion in such a report is not competent evidence, Ward v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 177, 178, 217 S.E.2d 810, 811 (1975) (cause-of-death opinion), and we find no merit in this assignment of b. Rebuttal and Surrebuttal Testimony Defendant assigns er......
  • Lucas v. Riverhill Poultry, Inc.
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 1 Julio 2021
    ...of opinion that the decedent died as a result of homicide was incompetent. Id. at 537, 311 S.E.2d 769 (quoting Ward v. Commonwealth , 216 Va. 177, 178, 217 S.E.2d 810 (1975) ).3 We reasoned that[w]here the facts and circumstances shown in evidence are such that [jurors] of ordinary intellig......
  • Morris v. Com., Record No. 0064-07-2.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 8 Abril 2008
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT