Ward v. Ward
| Citation | 69 P.2d 963,156 Or. 686 |
| Parties | WARD v. WARD. |
| Decision Date | 29 June 1937 |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
In Banc.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Malheur County; Charles W. Ellis, Judge.
On petition for rehearing.
Petition for rehearing denied.
For former opinion, see 68 P.2d 763.
A. L. Fletcher, of Nyssa, for appellant.
Lytle & Coad, of Vale, for respondent.
The respondent has filed a petition for rehearing, but in his petition there are no propositions raised that the court did not give full and careful consideration to in the opinion, and the petition for rehearing will be denied.
It is further suggested that in the opinion no disposition was made by the court regarding costs and disbursements. Unless the opinion otherwise provides, costs and disbursements in an equity suit are allowable to the prevailing party. However, in this cause, after due consideration, we are of the opinion that neither party shall recover costs and disbursements in this court, and the mandate will so provide.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marriage of Cope, Matter of
...previous matters had been submitted on stipulated facts. As stated by the Supreme Court in Ward v. Ward, 156 Or. 686, 690, 68 P.2d 763, 69 P.2d 963 (1937): "If the court deems that a stipulation, entered into between the parties, regarding the custody and maintenance of minor children, is f......
-
State ex rel. Stirewalt v. Stirewalt
...settlement by contempt proceedings. Jensen v. Jensen, 249 Or. 423, 438 P.2d 1013 (1968); Ward v. Ward, 156 Or. 686, 68 P.2d 763, 69 P.2d 963 (1937). See also, Annotation, 154 A.L.R. 443 (1945); Stone v. Stidham, 96 Ariz. 235, 393, P.2d 923 (1964); Cocke v. Cocke, 13 Ariz.App. 57, 474 P.2d 6......
-
Whittier v. Whittier
...section 1870, page 2032, section 1884; Brevet v. Brevet, 316 Ill.App. 406, 45 N.W.2d 199; Ward v. Ward, 156 Ore. 686, 68 P.2d 763, 765, 69 P.2d 963. The of which the stipulation is a part, should be construed in accordance with its evident intention. 27 C.J.S., Divorce, § 251c(2)(b), p. 102......
- State v. Weitzel