Wardell v. Railroad Company

Citation103 U.S. 651,26 L.Ed. 509
PartiesWARDELL v. RAILROAD COMPANY
Decision Date01 October 1880
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

Mr. James O. Broadhead and Mr. James M. Woolworth for the appellant.

Mr. Andrew J. Poppleton for the appellee.

MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

The road of the Union Pacific Railroad Company passes for its entire length, from Omaha on the Missouri River to Ogden in Utah, a distance of 1,036 miles, through a country almost destitute of timber ft for fuel. During its construction, however, large deposits of coal, of excellent quality and easily worked, were discovered in land along its line, from which abundant supplies for the use of the company could be obtained. The complainant represents that their extent, quality, and value were unknown, and that doubts were generally entertained as to their adequacy to meet the necessities of the company, until he had made explorations in June, 1868, and reported to its managers the information which he had thus acquired; and that upon that information the contract which has given rise to this suit was made, after much negotiation, between the company and himself and Cyrus O. Godfrey, with whom he had become associated in business. But in this respect he is mistaken. Though he may have imparted to the managers the information acquired by his explorations, the knowledge of the existence and general character of the deposits had been communicated to them years before by the engineers appointed to survey the route for the construction of the road. They had reported that coal in inexhaustible quantities, of suitable quality for the purposes of the company, was found so near the line of the road as to render its extraction and delivery easy and convenient. It is of little moment, however, whether the knowledge of the existence, character, extent, and accessibility of the deposits was obtained from the complainant or from others; it is sufficient that the directors of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, having the control and management of its road and business, were informed upon the subject at the time the contract mentioned was made. That contract was as follows:——

'This agreement, made this sixteenth day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, between the Union Pacific Railroad Company, by its proper officers, of the first part, and Cyrus O. Godfrey and Thomas Wardell, of the State of Missouri, or assigns, parties of the second part:——

'Witnesseth, that the said party of the first part agrees that the said parties of the second part may prospect at their own expense for coal on the whole line of the Union Pacific railway, and its branches and extensions, and open and operate any mines discovered, at their own expense; that said railroad company agrees to purchase of said parties of the second part all clean merchantable coal mined along its road, needful for engines, depots, shops, and other purposes of the company, and to pay for the same the first two years at the rate of six dollars per ton; for the next three years at five dollars per ton; for the four years thereafter at four dollars per ton; and for the six years remaining at the rate of three dollars per ton, delivered upon the cars at the mines of the said party of the second part, and which shall not be less than ten per cent added to the cost of the same to the said party of the second part. This contract to be and remain in full force and effect for the full term of fifteen years from the date hereof.

'The said railroad company agrees to facilitate the operations of the said parties of the second part, in prospecting and otherwise, by means of such information as it may possess, and by furnishing free passes on its road to the agents of the parties of the second part, not exceeding six in number. Said railroad company further agrees to put in switches and the necessary said-tracks, at such points as may be mutually agreed upon, for the accommodation of the business of the said parties of the second part; that the said parties of the second part agree to make all necessary exertions to increase the demand and consumption of coal by outside parties along the line of said railroad, and to open and operate mines at such points where coal may be discovered, as may be desired by said railroad company; and to expend within the first five years from the date of this agreement, in the purchase and development of mines and mining lands, and improvements for the opening, successful and economical workin of the same, not less than the sum of twenty thousand dollars; also to furnish for the use of the said railroad company good merchantable coal, and to pay all expenses for improvements for loading coal into cars. Any improvement desired by said railroad company in regard to the coal to be used by it shall be at the cost of said railroad company.

'In consideration of their exertions to increase the demand for coal, and the large sum to be expended in improvements, it is further agreed that the parties of the second part shall have the right to transport over the said railroad and its branches for the next fifteen years from the date of this agreement, coal for general consumption at the same freight that will be charged to others; but the said parties of the second part shall be entitled in consideration of services to be rendered as herein provided, to a drawback of twenty-five per cent on all sums charged for the transportation of coal.

'The said railroad company agrees to furnish the parties of the second part such cars as they may require in the operation of their business, and to transport them as promptly as possible. This agreement to remain in force for fifteen years.

'The coal lands owned by said party of the first part are hereby leased for the full term of fifteen years to the said parties of the second part or their assigns, for the purpose of working the same as may seem to them profitable; said parties of the second part to pay for the first nine years a royalty of twenty-five cents per ton for each ton of coal taken from their lands, excepting always coal taken from entries, air-courses, or passage-ways, for which coal no royalty shall be paid; payments for the same being due and payable monthly.

'The royalty for the last six years of this lease shall be free, provided the price of coal to the railway company is reduced to three dollars per ton. If three dollars ton, then in that case the royalty ton, them in that case the royalty shall be as during the first nine years.

'In witness whereof, we have hereunto set our hands seals, this the day and year first above mentioned.

(Signed) 'OLIVER AMES,

'President of the Union Pacific R. R. Co.

'C. O. GODFREY.

'THOMAS WARDELL.'

This contract on the part of the railroad company was made by direction of the executive committee of the board of directors, of whom the president was one, and not by the board itself. It was never reported to the board for its consideration or action. But notwithstanding this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
147 cases
  • Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co of New York
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 23 d1 Janeiro d1 1933
    ... ...   Petitioner, plaintiff below, owns 200 shares of the common stock of the American Tobacco Company which he acquired prior to the passage of chapter 175, p. 354, New Jersey Laws, 1920 (Comp. St ... Wardell v. Railroad Co., 103 U.S. 651, 26 L.Ed. 509; General Investment Co. v. American Hide & Leather Co., ... ...
  • Zeckendorf v. Steinfeld
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 20 d6 Março d6 1909
    ... ... ALBERT STEINFELD, R. K. SHELTON, SILVER BELL COPPER COMPANY, a Corporation, and MAMMOTH COPPER COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendants, Appellees and Appellants ... L.R.A. 294; Fox v. Hale & Norcross etc. M. Co., 108 ... Cal. 478, 41 P. 328; Wardell v. Union Pacific R.R ... Co., 103 U.S. 651, 26 L.Ed. 509, 7 Morr. Min. Rep. 144; ... Bill v ... ...
  • MAYFLOWER HOTEL STOCK. PC v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 26 d3 Janeiro d3 1949
    ... ... Brownville, Ft. Kearney & Pacific R. R. Co., 109 U.S. 522; 3 Wardell v. Railroad Co., 103 U.S. 651, 658 4 ; Corsicana National Bank v. Johnson, 251 U.S. 68, 90 5 ." ... Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury, 91 U.S. 587, 589; 7 Wardell v. Railroad Company, 103 U.S. 651, 657, et seq.; 8 Thomas v. Brownville, etc., R. R. Co., 109 U.S. 522, 524; 9 ... ...
  • Mayflower Hotel Stock. P. Com. v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 25 d1 Junho d1 1951
    ... ... stock on the false representation that a third party has offered a certain price for the company's stock, and then sell their own stock to such purchaser for more than three times as much, the ... at pages 588-589, as where the director profits at the expense of the corporation, Wardell v. Railroad Co., 1880, 103 U.S. 651, 658, 26 L.Ed. 509. As in the instance of interlocking ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT