Ware v. Carrom Health Care Products, Inc.
Citation | 727 F. Supp. 300 |
Decision Date | 19 December 1989 |
Docket Number | No. EC86-218-S-D.,EC86-218-S-D. |
Parties | Clara WARE, Plaintiff, v. CARROM HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Mississippi |
Wilbur Colom, Dennis Harmon, Columbus, Miss., for plaintiff.
J. Carter Thompson, Jr., Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, Jackson, Miss., for International Ins. Co.
Shane F. Langston, Holcomb, Dunbar, Connell, Chaffin & Willard, Jackson, Miss., for Everest and Jennings Intern., EV-JEN Medical, and Carrom Health Care Products, Inc.
Taylor B. Smith, Threadgill, Smith, Sanders & Jolly, Columbus, Miss., for St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
This cause is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. In short, "we are asked to declare the winner in a game of grammatical tug-of-war between an excess insurer and an insured over whether an excess insurance policy `drops down'1 in place of a policy issued by a now-insolvent primary insurer." Transco Exploration Co. v. Pacific Employers Insurance Co., 869 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1989).
The original complaint alleges that on February 1, 1984, a hospital bed manufactured by defendant Carrom Health Products, Inc., fell on plaintiff Clara Ware as she was performing her duties as housekeeper for the Oktibbeha County Hospital and caused serious injury to her back. Her theories of recovery are that the bed was defective and unreasonably dangerous and negligently designed.
Mission American Insurance Company, Carrom's liability carrier, hired an attorney to defend the suit. An answer was filed on Carrom's behalf but then, on September 11, 1987, counsel was allowed to withdraw. The magistrate's order indicated that Mission American had been placed under conservatorship by the State of California and attempts to contact any entity carrying on business in the name of Carrom were unsuccessful.2
International Insurance Company filed an intervening petition because it had issued to Carrom a policy of excess insurance. The request for declaratory judgment relief was based on an argument consistently maintained throughout this litigation:
A contestant for this position immediately surfaced in the corporate persons of Everest and Jennings International and EV-JEN Medical,3 on whose behalf a Rule 57 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment was filed.
After default was averted, International and Carrom filed respective motions for summary judgment.4 The construction of a contract is squarely before us;5 any analysis must be preceded by mapping out its relevant provisions.
According to the declarations sheet, the limit of liability for certain coverages and the aggregate limit for each annual period with respect to other hazards is $5,000,000.00 each. Item 4(c), "self-insured retention," is zero. The schedule of underlying comprehensive general liability insurance for bodily injury, combined single limit, is $500,000.00 each occurrence and $500,000.00 aggregate when applicable. A $1,900.00 annual premium is "flat charged;" next to estimated annual exposure is "N/A."
The body of the policy contains, inter alia, the following language:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Canal Ins. Co. v. Montello, Inc.
...law) (same); Guaranty Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Bayside Resort, Inc., 635 F.Supp. 1456 (D. V.I. 1986) (same); Ware v. Carrom Health Care Prods., Inc., 727 F.Supp. 300, 305 (N.D. Miss. 1989) (Mississippi law) (same); Highlands Ins. Co. v. Gerber Prods. Co., 702 F.Supp. 109, 112 (D. Md. 1988) (Maryla......
-
Revco DS, Inc. v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
...the policy into one guaranteeing the solvency of whatever primary insurer the insured might choose"); Ware v. Carrom Health Care Products, Inc., 727 F.Supp. 300, 308-309 (N.D.Miss. 1989) (court stating that underlying insurance is not "exhausted" by a request in a complaint that is beyond t......
-
Hocker v. New Hampshire Ins. Co.
...when the primary carrier is insolvent. See Harville v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 885 F.2d 276 (5th Cir.1989); Ware v. Carrom Health Care Products, Inc., 727 F.Supp. 300 (D.Miss.1989). First, these cases are not in point because they construe the contractual obligations of an excess carrier b......
-
Transportation Insurance Company v. Ritts Distributing Company, Inc., No. 3:94CV46-B-A (N.D. Miss. 1995)
...Co. v. Brown, 446 So. 2d 1002, 1006 (Miss. 1984), it should not create an ambiguity where none exists. Ware v. Carrom Health Care Prods., Inc., 727 F. Supp. 300, 304-05 (N.D. Miss. 1989); Brander v. Nabors, 443 F. Supp. 764, 769 (N.D. Miss. 1978), aff'd, 579 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1978). The la......