Warner, In re, D--2
| Citation | 43 N.J. 254,203 A.2d 259 |
| Decision Date | 22 September 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. D--2,D--2 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Arthur WARNER, An Attorney-at-Law. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
Frederick C. Vonhof, Newark, for the order.
No appearance for respondent.
The respondent was convicted of grand theft, a felony, in the Superior Court of California. On appeal the conviction was affirmed. People v. Warner, 134 Cal.App.2d 829, 286 P.2d 560 (D.Ct.App.1955). The Supreme Court of the United States denied his application for a writ of certiorari. Warner v. California, 351 U.S. 912, 76 S.Ct. 701, 100 L.Ed. 1446 (1956). The respondent has offered his resignation from the bar of this State but in the circumstances that offer is unacceptable.
The order of the court is that the name of the respondent be striken from the roll of attorneys.
For disbarment: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
Opposed: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Goldberg, Matter of
...an equally serious nature have resulted in disbarment in New Jersey. See In re Ivler, 86 N.J. 398, 431 A.2d 846 (1981); In re Warner, 43 N.J. 254, 203 A.2d 259 (1964). Other jurisdictions have concluded that an attorney's conviction on charges of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with......