Warren v. Rushing

Decision Date18 January 1916
Docket Number(No. 215.)
Citation144 Ga. 612,87 S.E. 775
PartiesWARREN et al. v. RUSHING.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from Superior Court, Chatham County; W. G. Charlton, Judge.

Action by W. M. Warren and others against J. I. Rushing. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. Reversed.

Hard wick & Wright, of Sanders ville, and Osborne & Lawrence, of Savannah, for plaintiffs in error.

H. P. Cobb and W. R. Hewlett, both of Savannah, for defendant in error.

HILL, J. Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except FISH, C. J., absent on account of sickness.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Howell Gas of Athens, Inc. v. Coile
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 1965
    ...Richards & Associates v. Studstill, 212 Ga. 375, 93 S.E.2d 3; Lewis v. Wilson, 111 Ga.App. 666, 142 S.E.2d 852. Cf. Warren v. Rushing, 144 Ga. 612(1), 87 S.E. 775; Jordan v. Charles S. Martin Distr. Co., 90 Ga.App. 186, 82 S.E.2d 263; Charles S. Martin Distr. Co. v. Roberts, 111 Ga.App. 653......
  • Fowler v. Southern Airlines
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1941
    ... ... DuPre, 111 Ga. 819(2), 35 S.E. 684; Central of ... Georgia Ry. Co. v. Brown, 113 Ga. 414(3), 38 S.E. 989, ... 84 Am.St.Rep. 250; Warren v. Rushing, 144 Ga. 612, ... 87 S.E. 775. The principle underlying the rule announced in ... the cases just cited supports the proposition that if ... ...
  • Rhodes v. Southern Flour & Grain Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 20, 1932
    ... ... though by default, is absolutely void and may be attacked by ... affidavit of illegality. Warren v. Rushing, 144 Ga ... 612 (1), 87 S.E. 775; Jackson v. Hitchcock, 48 Ga ... 491 (2); Keaton v. Moore, 59 Ga. 554; ... Planters' Bank v. Berry, ... ...
  • Berger v. Noble
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 1950
    ...against the movant Berger. In support of this contention counsel cites Metcalf v. Hale, 42 Ga.App. 402, 156 S.E. 301, and Warren v. Rushing, 144 Ga. 612, 87 S.E. 775. The facts of the record of this case do not bear out the contentions of movant. The movant was the defendant in the court be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT