Warren v. United States, 15851.

Decision Date19 April 1956
Docket NumberNo. 15851.,15851.
Citation232 F.2d 629
PartiesLewis William WARREN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

No appearance entered for appellant.

William O. Braecklein, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Heard L. Floore, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before RIVES, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

By motion under 28 U.S.Code § 2255 appellant questions the validity of his conviction upon his plea of guilty and ten year sentence (as a third offender) for violation of 26 U.S.Code § 2593(a).1 While he asserts that he was not properly informed of the cause and nature of the accusation against him, the record affirmatively shows otherwise. His plea of guilty, advisedly entered, precludes further inquiry into his complaints that he was improperly searched and that the government failed to prove portions of the indictment. His further complaint that the district court lacked authority to impose a prison sentence under a statute relating to taxes is patently frivolous. Finding no error in the record, the judgment is

Affirmed.

1 "It shall be unlawful for any person who is a transferee required to pay the transfer tax imposed by section 2590(a) to acquire or otherwise obtain any marihuana without having paid such tax; and proof that any person shall have had in his possession any marihuana and shall have failed, after reasonable notice and demand by the collector, to produce the order form required by section 2591 to be retained by him, shall be presumptive evidence of guilt under this section and of liability for the tax imposed by section 2590(a)."

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Swepston v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • June 21, 1961
    ...Gonzalez v. United States, 1 Cir., 1954, 210 F.2d 825, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 966, 77 S.Ct. 1050, 1 L.Ed. 2d 915; Warren v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 629; Edwards v. United States, 1958, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 256 F.2d 707, certiorari denied 358 U.S. 847, 79 S.Ct. 74, 3 L.Ed.......
  • Alexander v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 4, 1961
    ...from our consideration by the plea of guilty, assuming of course that the plea was advisedly and voluntarily made. Warren v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 629. The mistake of appellant's counsel, if mistake it was, in recommending a plea of guilty, cannot be corrected by us. The ent......
  • State v. Lopez
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • September 29, 1965
    ...Alexander v. United States, 290 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961); Swepston v. United States, 289 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1961); Warren v. United States, 232 F.2d 629 (5th Cir. 1956). When a defendant voluntarily and knowingly pleads guilty at his trial this constitutes a waiver of all nonjurisdictional ......
  • State of Louisiana v. Allgood
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • July 13, 1966
    ...9, 1964); Phillips v. United States, 318 F.2d 17 (CA 5, 1963); Alexander v. United States, 290 F.2d 252 (CA 5, 1961); Warren v. United States, 232 F.2d 629 (CA 5, 1956). For these reasons, petitioner's application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus will be ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT