Warren v. Wester
| Decision Date | 06 April 2001 |
| Citation | 796 So.2d 377 |
| Parties | Sandra WARREN, administratrix of the Estate of James Williams, Deceased v. Terry WESTER, Wade Hankinson, Ken Nix, and Ronnie Adrian. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Steven T. Marshall of McLaughlin & Marshall, L.L.C., Guntersville, for appellant.
Robert S. Lamar, Jr., of Lamar, Burgess, Hale, Miller, Norris & Feldman, P.C., Birmingham, for appellees.
On September 13, 1997, James Williams was found dead inside the "waste-breading trailer" on the premises of his employer, Cagles, Inc. ("Cagles"). The official cause of death was asphyxiation caused by being exposed to an extreme concentration of carbon dioxide ("CO2") gas. Sandra Warren, Williams's common-law wife, sued Cagles, seeking workers' compensation survivor's benefits. She also sued two third parties, Griffin Industries, Inc. ("Griffin") and BOC Group, Inc. ("BOC"), alleging various tort claims, and four coemployees, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-11(c)(1): Terry Wester, the plant safety coordinator; Wade Hankinson, the plant manager; Ken Nix, the corporate safety coordinator; and Ronnie Adrian, the first-shift production manager. Cagles settled the workers' compensation claim in November 1999. On April 27, 2000, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the coemployees. Warren appealed the summary judgment to the Alabama Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this court, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 12-2-7(6).
An appeal ordinarily lies only from a final judgment. Ala.Code 1975, § 12-22-2; Bean v. Craig, 557 So.2d 1249, 1253 (Ala.1990). A judgment is generally not final unless all claims, or the rights or liabilities of all parties, have been decided. Ex parte Harris, 506 So.2d 1003, 1004 (Ala.Civ.App.1987). The only exception to this rule is when the trial court directs the entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P. Bean, 557 So.2d at 1253.
On the date the trial court entered the summary judgment for the coemployees, the case action summary sheet contained an entry suggesting that the case had been disposed of by settlement. However, the entry does not indicate which party or parties had entered a settlement or that the trial court had actually entered an order disposing of the case; in addition, the record does not contain an order disposing of any claims as to any party. Accordingly, we conclude that the entry fails to adjudicate any claims as to any parties, see Rule 58(b), Ala.R.Civ.P., and that the claims against Griffin and BOC are still pending in the trial court.
Because the record does not reflect that the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Campbell v. Taylor , 2091072.
...pending, despite indication in the case-action summary that action had been disposed of in its entirety); and Warren v. Wester, 796 So.2d 377, 379 (Ala.Civ.App.2001) (holding that the entry in the case-action summary indicating that the action had been disposed of did not, of itself, “adjud......
-
Campbell v. Taylor, 2091072
...pending, despite indication in the case-action summary that action had been disposed of in itsentirety); and Warren v. Wester, 796 So. 2d 377, 379 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001) (holding that the entry in the case-action summary indicating that the action had been disposed of did not, of itself, "ad......
-
Warren v. Wester
...remained pending below and the trial court had not made the summary judgment final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P. Warren v. Wester, 796 So.2d 377 (Ala.Civ.App.2001). The trial court has since dismissed the claims against the corporate defendants, and Warren again appealed the summa......
-
Richardson v. Merchant (In re Merchant)
... ... indication in the case-action summary that action had been ... disposed of in its entirety); and Warren v. Wester, ... 796 So.2d 377, 379 (Ala. Civ. App.2001) (holding that the ... entry in the case-action summary indicating that the action ... ...