Warrender v. Warrender
| Decision Date | 04 May 1964 |
| Docket Number | No. A--77,A--77 |
| Citation | 200 A.2d 123,42 N.J. 287 |
| Parties | Rosemary WARRENDER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John Walker WARRENDER, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Samuel Levin, Newark, for plaintiff-respondent.
Leslie H. Cohen, Newark, for defendant-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered
We affirm generally on the opinion of the Appellate Division, 79 N.J.Super. 114, 190 A.2d 684 (App.Div.1963).
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN--7.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
Newburgh v. Arrigo
...N.J. 531, 537, 64 A.2d 436 (1949). See Warrender v. Warrender, 79 N.J.Super. 114, 121, 190 A.2d 684 (App.Div.1963), aff'd o. b., 42 N.J. 287, 200 A.2d 123 (1964); Hollingshead v. Hollingshead, 91 N.J. Eq. 261, 110 A. 19 It follows that where public policy, as recognized by our matrimonial l......
-
Boyter v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...v. Clark, 192 So. 2d 594 (La. Ct. App. 1966); Warrender v. Warrender, 79 N.J. Super. 114, 190 A.2d 684 (1963), affd. per curiam 42 N.J. 287, 200 A.2d 123 (1964). 11. We recognize that respondent is on record as generally following the policy petitioner supports. See G.C.M. 25250, 1947-2 C.B......
-
Kazin v. Kazin
...in our own cases, E. g., Tonti v. Chadwick, supra; Warrender v. Warrender, 79 N.J.Super. 114, 190 A.2d 684 (App.Div.1963), aff'd 42 N.J. 287, 200 A.2d 123 (1964); State v. Najjar, 1 N.J.Super. 208, 63 A.2d 807 (App.Div.), aff'd 2 N.J. 208, 66 A.2d 37 (1949); see, Untermann v. Untermann, 19 ......
-
Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel
...their own public policy refused to accept as valid such Mexican divorces (Golden v. Golden, 41 N.M. 356, 68 P.2d 928; Warrender v. Warrender, 42 N.J. 287, 200 A.2d 123; Bobala v. Bobala, 68 Ohio App. 63, 33 N.E.2d There is squarely presented to this court now for the first time the question......
Request a trial to view additional results