Wash. Trucking Ass'ns v. Wash. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 17–145.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation138 S.Ct. 261 (Mem),199 L.Ed.2d 124
Docket NumberNo. 17–145.,17–145.
Parties WASHINGTON TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, et al., petitioners, v. WASHINGTON EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, et al.
Decision Date02 October 2017

138 S.Ct. 261 (Mem)
199 L.Ed.2d 124

WASHINGTON TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, et al., petitioners,
v.
WASHINGTON EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, et al.

No. 17–145.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2017.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Larose v. King Cnty., 50858-3-II
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • March 19, 2019
    ...under CR 12(b)(6) de novo. Wash. Trucking Ass’n v. Emp’t Sec. Dep’t , 188 Wash.2d 198, 207, 393 P.3d 761, cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 261, 199 L.Ed.2d 124 (2017). Dismissal is appropriate when it appears beyond doubt that a plaintiff will be unable to prove any set of facts that w......
  • Freedom Found. v. Wash. State Pub. Disclosure Comm'n
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • February 15, 2022
    ...ruling on a CR 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Wash. Trucking Ass'n v. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 188 Wn.2d 198, 207, 393 P.3d 761, cert. denied, 138 S.Ct. 261 (2017). Dismissal is appropriate when it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts that would justify recovery. Id. ......
  • Plumbing v. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, 51767-1-II
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • July 31, 2018
    ...the same under both CR 12(b)(6) and CR 12(c). Wash. Trucking Ass'ns v. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 188 Wn.2d 198, 207, 393 P.3d 761, cert. denied 138 S.Ct. 261 (2017). We review the trial court's dismissal de novo. Id. Dismissal is appropriate when it appears beyond doubt that a plaintiff will be una......
  • Plumbing v. Wash. State Dep't of Labor & Indus., 51767-1-II
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Washington
    • July 31, 2018
    ...the same under both CR 12(b)(6) and CR 12(c). Wash. Trucking Ass'ns v. Emp't Sec. Dep't, 188 Wn.2d 198, 207, 393 P.3d 761, cert. denied 138 S. Ct. 261 (2017). We review the trial court's dismissal de novo. Id. Dismissal is appropriate when it appears beyond doubt that a plaintiff will be un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT