Washington County, Neb., v. Williams
Decision Date | 28 October 1901 |
Docket Number | 1,486.,1,533 |
Citation | 111 F. 801 |
Parties | WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEB., v. WILLIAMS. BLAIR et al. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEB., et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
John L Kennedy and F. S. Howell (Herman Aye, on the briefs), for Washington county.
W. J Courtright and F. Dolezal (B. T. White and J. B. Sheean, on the briefs), for J. Bertram Williams, De Witt C. Blair, and others.
These are two cases, one at law and the other in equity, which in the main involve the same questions, and have been argued and briefed together. The controversy arises out of the following facts:
On July 1, 1869, Washington county, in the state of Nebraska executed and delivered to the Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company 149 obligations, in the following form:
$500.00
'Be it known, that the county of Washington, in the state of Nebraska, acknowledges itself to owe and to stand indebted to the Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company in the sum of five hundred dollars, which sum the board of county commissioners of said county, in the name and on behalf of the said county, hereby promises to pay to said Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company or bearer, at the office of the county treasurer of said county, with interest at the rate of seven per cent. per annum, which principal and interest are to be raised and paid by an annual levy of a tax of one mill on the dollar on the entire taxable property in said county, and the sum to be raised by taxation is to be applied first in the payment of the interest on this and 149 other bonds of the same date and amount, and next in the payment of the principal sum and annually accruing interest, until the whole of the principal and interest shall have been paid and extinguished, and which payments are to be made on the first day of July next following the date hereof, and annually thereafter on the first day of July. This obligation is one of a series numbered from one (1) to one hundred and fifty (150), each for the sum of $500, and in the aggregate amounting to $75,000, issued by the said county of Washington to aid in the construction of the Sioux City and Pacific Railroad from a point on the Missouri river in Washington county aforesaid, and running thence westerly through said county, forming a connection with the Union Pacific Railroad at or near Fremont, in Dodge county, in accordance with a vote of the electors of said county of Washington at an election held on the ninth day of June, 1868, for the purpose of taking a vote on the proposition to aid the said railroad company in the construction of said railroad by the board of county commissioners of said county executing and delivering to said railroad company the bonds of said county calling for the payment of $75,000, with interest at the rate of seven per cent. per annum, and to be paid by an annual levy of a tax of one mill on the dollar of the entire taxable property of said county until such time as the amount thus raised will extinguish the whole amount of the principal and interest and accruing interest, which proposition was submitted and adopted under the provisions of the ninth chapter of the Revised Statutes of the State of Nebraska. The said railroad having been built by the said railroad company after the adoption of said proposition as contemplated therein, and within the time therein mentioned, this bond, with the others of the series above mentioned, is issued in pursuance thereof, as well also as under the provisions of an act of the legislature of the state of Nebraska approved February 15, 1869, entitled 'An act to enable counties, cities and precincts to borrow money on their bonds, or to issue bonds to aid in the construction or completion of works of internal improvement in this state, and to legalize bonds already issued for such purposes.'
'In testimony whereof, we, the board of county commissioners of said county of Washington, have hereunto set our hands and caused the seal of said county to be affixed on this first day of July, A.D. 1869.
Nebraska.). . . . Commissioners.
'P. N. Besmer, County Clerk.'
It appears to have been the intention of the county to issue 150 of such obligations, but, as a matter of fact, only 149 were issued, making the aggregate amount of the indebtedness incurred $74,500.
The ninth chapter of the Revised Statutes of Nebraska, which is referred to in said obligations, was an act passed by the legislative assembly of the territory of Nebraska on January 11, 1861. Laws Neb. 1860-61, pp. 146 to 153, inclusive. That act contained, in part, the following provisions:
While this law was in force, and on June 9, 1868, an election was held in conformity therewith for the purpose of taking the sense of the people on a proposition to aid the Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company in the construction of its road from a point on the Missouri river to a junction with the Union Pacific Railroad at or near Fremont, Neb.; and at such election the proposition to aid in the construction of such road in the manner and to the amount indicated in the obligation above quoted was duly approved, and such aid was authorized by the people. While said road was in process of construction, and after it had been for the most part completed, the legislature of the state of Nebraska, on February 15, 1869, passed another act (Laws Neb. 1869, p. 92), entitled 'An act to enable counties, cities and precincts to borrow money on their bonds, or to issue bonds to aid in the construction or completion of works of internal improvement in this state, and to legalize bonds already issued for such purpose. ' This act contained the following provisions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co
...D.C., 4 F.Supp. 172, 173. 12 Peeler v. Lathrop, 5 Cir., 48 F. 780; Ung Lung Chung v. Holmes, C.C., 98 F. 323; Washington County v. Williams, 8 Cir., 111 F. 801; Greene County Bank v. Teasdale Co., C.C., 112 F. 801; American Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. Winzeler, D.C., 227 F. 321; Bruner Co. v. ......
-
Holly Sugar Corporation v. Fritzler
...Prevention of a multiplicity of suits was an insufficient ground for equitable jurisdiction. 10 R. C. L. 381; 21 C. J. 78; Washington Co. v. Williams, 111 F. 801; Co. v. Hopkins, (Ala.) 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 464; Cumberland Co. v. Williams, (Miss.) 57 So. 559; Pankey v. Ortez, (N. M.) 195 P. ......
-
Lucas v. City of Nampa
...Cas. 193, and note at p. 197, 77 N.E. 169; Bank v. Elgin, 136 Ill.App. 453; 28 Cyc. 611, note 4; 19 R. C. L. 286, note 6; Washington County v. Williams, 111 F. 801, 49 C. A. 621; National Bank v. Petterson, 200 Ill. 215, 65 N.E. 687; McQuillin, Municipal Corp., sec. 2269.) The holders of sp......
-
Leslie Blau Co. v. Alfieri
...Tank Car Corp. v. Goree, 4 Cir., 296 F. 32; Moore v. Security Trust & Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 168 F. 496; Washington County, Neb., v. Williams, 8 Cir., 111 F. 801, 810, 811; Simpson v. Scott, 189 Va. 392, 53 S.E.2d 21; Holcomb v. Webley, 185 Va. 150, 37 S.E.2d 762; Restatement of Contracts, ......