Washington Post Co. v. Kelly, 4816.

Decision Date04 February 1930
Docket NumberNo. 4816.,4816.
Citation38 F.2d 151
PartiesWASHINGTON POST CO. v. KELLY.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

W. J. Lambert and R. H. Yeatman, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

L. H. David and V. H. Wallace, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff (appellee here) in the Supreme Court of the District in an action for libel based upon the following article published in appellant's newspaper in the District of Columbia:

"`Woman in Black' Held: Residence Here Denied.

"`Jane Doe' Identified in New York as Former Governess to Wealthy Heiress. $5,000 Bail Defaulted.

"New York, March 28.

"`The woman in black,' arraigned today and held in default of $5,000 bail, to await hearing on charges of obtaining $93 from a Fifth Avenue shop by returning goods not purchased there, tonight was identified as Millicent Fay, former governess for Mrs. Louise Wise Lewis, heiress to the $60,000,000 Henry M. Flagler fortune.

"On a passport obtained in New York, five years ago, she gave her name as Rosalie Cecelia Kelly, of Garrison, Md., and said that she was born August 13, 1895.

"Later, the police learned she apparently lived at 1341 East Capitol Street, Washington, as Rose C. Kelly.

"The `woman in black' who said that the name `Jane Doe' would do, when questioned by Magistrate Levine, was arrested Thursday night in her apartment, after police had traced a package through several nearby towns.

* * * * * *

"A woman who said she was Miss Rose C. Kelly, residing in the Norwood Apartment house at 1341 East Capitol Street, yesterday denied any knowledge of Millicent Fay, or Rosalie Cecelia Kelly, of Garrison, Md. Neither did she know Mrs. Louise Wise Lewis, she said.

"She had been bothered by reporters about the same kind of story last September, and had then declared her ignorance of any part of it. She could not explain how the name and address had come into the possession of the New York Police, she said.

"The woman who said she was Miss Rose Kelly said she had lived in the same apartment house for the last four years, and demanded the statement of the New York police not be published."

All the assignments of error necessary to be noticed, to quote from appellant's brief, "raise substantially the same questions, namely, whether or not the article complained of on its face shows that any part of it, which might be considered libelous, was published of and concerning plaintiff, or could be so understood by average readers of The Post."

For several years prior to the publication of this article, appellee, an unmarried woman, had lived at the Norwood apartment house, 1341 East Capitol street, Washington, D. C., with two of her unmarried sisters. She had been an employee of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing for many years, and had been in no way connected with the incident referred to in the article; all of which would have appeared had any real attempt been made to develop the truth.

In view of what follows, the caption of the article is significant: "`Woman in Black' Held; Residence Here Denied." After stating that the woman in black had been arraigned and held in default of $5,000 bail, to await hearing on charges of obtaining money through a fraudulent device, and that five years previously the woman had given her name as Rosalie Cecelia Kelly, the article continues: "Later, the police learned she apparently lived at 1341 East Capitol Street, Washington, as Rose C. Kelly." (Italics ours.) After stating that the "woman in black" had given an alias when questioned by the magistrate at the time of her arrest, the article continues: "A woman who said she was Miss Rose C. Kelly, residing in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Croixland Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Corcoran
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • April 13, 1999
    ...never named or is misnamed. See, e.g., Peck v. Tribune Co., 214 U.S. 185, 188-90, 29 S.Ct. 554, 53 L.Ed. 960 (1909); Washington Post Co. v. Kelly, 38 F.2d 151 (D.C.Cir.1930); Harmon v. Liss, 116 A.2d 693, 695 (D.C.1955); see also Service Parking Corp. v. Washington Times Co., 92 F.2d 502, 5......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT