Washington Rock Co. v. Young

Decision Date08 April 1905
Docket Number1565
Citation80 P. 382,29 Utah 108
CourtUtah Supreme Court
PartiesWASHINGTON ROCK CO. v. YOUNG et al

APPEAL from District Court, Salt Lake County; C. W. Morse, Judge.

Action by the Washington Rock Company against Le Grand Young and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant Young appeals.

REVERSED.

O. W Moyle for appellant.

Sutherland Van Cott & Allison and William D. Riter for respondent.

BARTCH C. J., delivered the opinion of the court. McCARTY, J STRAUP, J., concurring.

OPINION

BARTCH, C. J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS.

This is a controversy over a lost boundary or survey. The plaintiff is the owner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter, and the appellant of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, of section 12, township 1 south, of range 1 east, Salt Lake meridian. Along the boundary line between the two tracts is located a stone quarry, which, if the line is as claimed by the plaintiff, belongs to the rock company; if it is as claimed by the appellant, it belongs to him. The following diagram shows the location of the premises, as referred to by the evidence:

Distance from A to where original surveyor claims he set corner indicated by E is 7,920 feet. This locates quarry west of line G-H. Distance from A to where subsequent surveyors replaced corner at E is 7,749 feet. This locates quarry east of line G-H.

Mr. Dickert, who made the original survey of the line in controversy, testified: "In 1881 and 1882 I made a survey of the land in question for the government, as a deputy United States surveyor. The government paid me for my services. . . . Mr. Young made an application in the surveyor general's office to have this land surveyed, covering the quarries. . . . I established the southwest corner of section 11, marked R on defendant's Exhibit A. From this I ran east, and found the rock in place at A, that must have been set by Burr. My survey came out exactly with him. . . . I ran east from A on a true line, giving each mile eighty chains. I established a mile corner at B; then from there I set every twenty chains a cedar stake about two or three inches in a pile of rocks, so as to find out where the twenty-chain post comes. We do not establish them for the government, but I established it for Mr. Young, to find out where the quarter sections were. At D I established the quarter-section corner; put a big monument there. Went twenty chains farther to T, and I set a stake. Then I established the southeast corner of section 12 at E. Each mile had eighty chains. No other survey had been made of the point E, or of any point I surveyed, except A, which was just northwest of the pesthouse. . . . From E I ran north, and established the east boundary of 12 at the corner marked F. When I came to the half-mile post, I found the country was so rough it was no use to run farther, for the purpose we run the line was to cover the quarry. The line was sufficient. I stopped at F, and made a large pile of rock, and in the neighborhood there was some large rock. I marked witness corners. I forget--it is twenty-one or two years--but my notes prove that. If they wanted to retrace the line, they could have done it by running to that corner. I established X on the north line of section 12, and from there run a half mile east between sections 12 and 1, and established Y. . . . Then, with reference to establishing the lines of this forty acres of Judge Young's, I run a line north from a point twenty chains east of the quarter-section corner. That is the line north from F. I also run north from D to K twenty chains, and established the corner there. I also set a corner at H, then we run up north another twenty chains, and I set there a big scrub cedar or something--I don't recollect--and I gave Mr. Young a complete map of the survey and the notes. This last point was G. Then I went west twenty chains and established I. I established, therefore, K, H, G, I, and put posts at each corner, to cover the land to Judge Young. I have visited this land again lately. I was there in November or December of last year with Mr. Hardy, the surveyor. He is in court. I went along what is marked the 'wagon road' on the map. We stopped about 15 chains from the quarry. Did not walk up to the quarry. I set the posts G and H. I remember when I made the survey that there was a quarry on the west side of the line. I did not see anything on the east side. . . . It [the line] must have been twenty or thirty feet east of the quarry, and left the quarry in Judge Young's land. . . . I established point A exactly where the Burr monument was. Did not change it at all."

The official field notes of Mr. Dickert's survey, in the custody of the United States surveyor general, which were introduced in evidence, show the manner of making that survey as follows: "Survey commenced at the remains of an old mutual corner of sections 10, 11, 14 and 15, thence east on the line between sections 11 and 14 to the quarter corner, at which place a sandstone monument was set, the southeast corner of the pesthouse bearing north forty-nine and one-half degrees west five chains from the monument; thence east to the southeast corner of section 11, eighty chains from beginning, at which place a monument was set; thence farther east forty chains on the true line between section 12 and 13 to the quarter-section corner, at which place a monument was set; thence farther east forty chains to the southeast corner of section 12 on east boundary of township, at which place a red sandstone monument was set, 20x10x9 inches. From the southwest corner of section 12, Mr. Dickert went north between sections 11 and 12 forty chains and set a red sandstone monument for a quarter-section corner; thence farther north forty chains to the northwest corner of section 12, at which place a monument was erected. The survey then proceeded west along the north side of section 11 and then from the northwest corner of section 12 proceeds east between sections 1 and 12 forty chains to quarter corner, at which place a monument was erected. Mr. Dickert also run north forty chains from the southeast corner of section 12 to quarter corner, at which place a sandstone monument was set."

The next survey was made by Mr. Ferron in October, 1884; and, referring to the field notes in the surveyor general's office, the witness Atkinson testified: 'These notes show that from the corner of townships 1 and 2 south, range 1, and 2 east, Mr. Ferron run north on a random line between said townships to the southeast corner of section 12; finding the distance to be four miles and nineteen links, and the falling to be sixty-five links north of corner to sections 7, 12, 13, and 18. This is a mistake. It should have been east or west. I adjusted my chains and instrument to the measurements found, and ran south between sections 13 and 18. From the corner to sections 7, 12, 13, and 18, which is a sandstone 20x10x9 inches, properly marked, Mr. Ferron run north between sections 7 and 12 forty chains, and found the old quarter corner, and went still farther north forty chains to the northeast corner of section 12, and there set a sandstone monument." The same witness, reading from the official field notes of Mr. Pancake's survey, which was made in December, 1884, said: "Mr. Pancake did not find the southwest corner of section 12. He re-established it. He reached that from the south boundary of the township. From that corner he run east on a random line forty chains, and found no trace of the old corner. He then went farther east forty chains, to the southeast corner of section 12, where he found the old corner; and from this corner he returned back forty chains, and there reset the quarter corner on the south of section 12; thence back to the southwest corner of section 12, where he reset the corner which was not found. From the southwest corner of section 12 he ran north forty chains to the quarter corner. He found no corner standing, and reset it. Thence farther north forty chains to the northwest corner of section 12, where he found no trace of the old corner, and there he reset a stone monument. From this point he ran east forty chains, and found no trace of the old corner, and there he reset a quarter corner. In order to establish the southeast corner of section 11, Mr. Pancake run from the south boundary of the township four miles south. He did not find the corner there, but re-established it. . . . The north and west and south boundary of section 12 was surveyed by Pancake. The east boundary of section 12 was surveyed by Ferron." On cross-examination the witness testified: "The first survey of section 12 was made by Mr. Dickert. This survey came from the west of point A to B, then north to X, thence from B to C, then from D to E, and established the quarter corners and the section corners. He didn't establish D. As a government surveyor, he wouldn't establish that. All we establish are the section and quarter-section corners. E, W, and Y were established by Mr. Dickert in 1881. Burr's survey was in 1856. A was the only corner located by Burr. In December, 1884, Mr. Ferron made his survey, and began four miles below E, and came north to E. He found E standing. I infer he found that corner all right. It practically says so. He starts from that point, four miles south. 'I run north on a random line between said townships to the corner of sections 7, 12, 13, and 18.'"

The witness Anderson, who was employed by the plaintiff company and made a survey of its land and the line in dispute, among other things testified: "Mr. Dickert's survey, whether correct or incorrect, would be binding if you could find the corners he put there at W and E and C. We are trying to replace his corners, and, if I started at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • See Ben Realty Co. v. Gothberg, 2168
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 21 Enero 1941
    ...its own information,' and 'cannot affect the rights of owners on the other side of the line already existing.'" In Washington Rock Co. v. Young, 29 Utah 108, 80 P. 382, was held that where an original government survey of land was made before the township line was established, the fact that......
  • Lawler v. Counties of Rice and Goodhue
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 26 Noviembre 1920
    ... ... 422, 57 S.W ... 126; Climer v. Wallace, 28 Mo. 556, 75 Am. Dec. 135; ... Washington Rock Co. v. Young, 29 Utah 108, 80 P ... 382, 110 Am. St. 666; Kilgore v. Carmichael, 42 Ore ... ...
  • Wing v. Wallace
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 28 Abril 1926
    ... ... accurate or not, and cannot be altered or controlled by ... subsequent surveys. (Washington Rock Co. v. Young, ... 29 Utah 108, 110 Am. St. 666, 80 P. 382; Ferry v ... Fowler, 37 Utah 34, ... ...
  • Titus v. Chapman
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • 22 Septiembre 2004
    ...by a new survey. Lawson, 50 S.D. at 558, 210 N.W. at 980 (citing Randall, 4 S.D. at 355, 57 N.W. at 10; Washington Rock Co. v. Young, 29 Utah 108, 80 P. 382 (1905)). Only upon obliteration of an original corner may a new survey be made from points that can be determined in accordance with t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT