Washington v. Arbogast
| Docket Number | 99452-8 |
| Decision Date | 31 March 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
State v. Butler
... ... State v. Arbogast , 199 Wash.2d 356, 380, 506 P.3d 1238 (2022) (citing State v. Arndt , 194 Wash.2d 784, 797, 798-813, 453 P.3d 696 (2019) ). 31 While Butler correctly identifies the value of instructing juries about the fallibility of cross-racial eyewitness identifications generally, we hold that he is not ... ...
-
Wright v. 3M Co.
...essential context of a legal theory risks delegating to the jury the task of determining the law. State v. Arbogast, 199 Wn.2d 356, 381, 506 P.3d 1238 (2022) (citing United States v. Zipkin, 729 F.2d 384, 387 (6th Cir. 1984) (holding it impermissible for a trial judge to delegate the determ......
-
May v. Spokane Cnty.
... ... Ste. 1300, Spokane, WA, 99201-0305, for Amicus Curiae on behalf of Washington State Association for Justice Foundation. WHITENER, J. 1 This case involves the delicate balance required in addressing the elimination of morally ... ...
-
Gomez v. White
... ... INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY CONCLUSION ... Petitioner ... Jose Barajas Gomez is a state prisoner who is currently ... confined at the Monroe Correctional Complex - Twin Rivers ... Unit, in Monroe, Washington. Petitioner has ... defendant has a burden to show some evidence in support of ... the defense. State v. Arbogast , 199 Wn.2d 356, 371, ... 506 P.3d 1238 (2022). For entrapment, the defendant must show ... evidence of inducement and predisposition ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results