Washington v. Brush

Docket Number90479-1
Decision Date02 July 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
110 cases
  • State v. Gouley
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 2021
    ...to an issue," that instruction "does not constitute an impermissible comment on the evidence by the trial judge." State v. Brush , 183 Wash.2d 550, 557, 353 P.3d 213 (2015). ¶ 28 We will generally refuse to review a claim of error that was not raised at the trial court. RAP 2.5(a). However,......
  • State v. Yishmael
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • February 6, 2020
    ..."declare the law." Id. Jury instructions that accurately state the law are not improper comments on the evidence. State v. Brush , 183 Wash.2d 550, 557, 353 P.3d 213 (2015) (quoting State v. Woods , 143 Wash.2d 561, 591, 23 P.3d 1046 (2001) ). By contrast, jury instructions that essentially......
  • State v. Brush
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 2018
  • State v. Bennett
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 2020
    ... ... different rooms also suggests a prolonged attack and ... lingering suffering ... Id ... Bennett ... contends the lack of evidence that Moore was subject to ... prolonged attack or lingering suffering makes his case like ... State v. Brush , No. 71067-2-I, 2014 WL 1912009 ... (Wash.Ct.App. May 12, 2014) (unpublished) ... http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/710672.pdf , ... aff'd in part, rev'd in part by 183 Wn.2d ... 550, 353 P.3d 213 (2015) and State v. Serrano , 95 ... Wn.App. 700, 977 P.2d 47 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free