Washington v. Hahn
| Docket Number | 86427-6 |
| Decision Date | 15 March 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
23 cases
-
State v. Cardenas-Flores
...(assault requires "proof of an ‘unlawful[ ] touching ... with criminal intent.’ " (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Hahn , 174 Wash.2d 126, 129, 271 P.3d 892 (2012) )). Cardenas-Flores appears to contend that "criminal intent" requires some form of malice. But she misconstrues our ......
-
State v. Inzunza
...incapable of inflicting that harm.’ ” Id., quoting State v. Walden, 67 Wash.App. 891, 841 P.2d 81, 83 (1992); accord State v. Hahn, 174 Wash.2d 126, 271 P.3d 892, 893 (2012); State v. Frohs, 83 Wash.App. 803, 924 P.2d 384, 390 (1996). These definitions specify different manners or methods o......
-
State v. Roussel
...that this "inferential leap to mere fourth degree assault is too great even when the evidence is interpreted in Hahn's favor." Hahn, 174 Wn.2d at 130.[7] The however, takes the "inferential leap" disapproved of in Hahn a step further, and would hold the jury could infer that Roussel committ......
-
State v. Roussel (In re Pers. Restraint Petition Roussel)
...Roussel's proposed fourth degree assault instruction.6 In State v. Hahn, 162 Wn. App. 885, 902, 256 P.3d 1267 (2011), rev'd, 174 Wn.2d 126, 271 P.3d 892 (2012), we held that the defendant's statements that he wanted the victim to "disappear" was sufficient to instruct the jury on solicitati......
Get Started for Free
