Washington v. Houston-Sconiers

Docket Number92605-1
Decision Date02 March 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
387 cases
  • State v. Comer
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 10, 2022
    ...absolute discretion to depart" from mandatory minimum sentences when they sentence juveniles in adult court. State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wash.2d 1, 391 P.3d 409, 414 (2017). The Court rested its decision on the Eighth Amendment.In the case, 17-year-old Zyion Houston-Sconiers and 16-year-......
  • State v. Thomas
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • January 19, 2022
    ...for juvenile offenders." Id. at 391, 266 A.3d 374 ; see State v. Lyle, 854 N.W.2d 378, 380 (Iowa 2014) ; State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wash.2d 1, 391 P.3d 409, 414 (2017). The Court then turned to the facts, noting that Comer and Zarate were sentenced under a statute that required them to ......
  • State v. Zwede
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 2, 2022
    ...youthfulness before determining an appropriate sentence.¶43 In 2017, our Supreme Court issued its decision in State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wash.2d 1, 391 P.3d 409 (2017). In that case, Zyion Houston-Sconiers and Treson Roberts, ages 17 and 16, went out on Halloween and, while armed with a......
  • State v. Reynolds
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • February 28, 2022
    ...schemes failing to take into account the fact that "children are different" are constitutionally infirm. State v. Houston-Sconiers, 188 Wash.2d 1, 18, 391 P.3d 409 (2017) (holding that Eighth Amendment requires courts to consider the mitigating characteristics of youth, and use appropriate ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Summation
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • May 5, 2022
    ...if a proper objection is made when the statement is made. The argument is waived by not objecting. WASHINGTON State v. Houston-Sconiers , 391 P.3d 409, 425 (Wash. 2017). Prosecutor’s use of a racial slur, and references to “a snitch code” used by “black people” were not misconduct. The pros......
  • YOUNG AND DANGEROUS: THE ROLE OF YOUTH IN RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 120 No. 3, December 2021
    • December 1, 2021
    ...characteristics of youth are universal.") (195.) See, e.g., State v. Lyle, 854 N.W.2d 378, 404 (Iowa 2014); State v. Houston-Sconiers, 391 P.3d 409,420 (Wash. 2017) ("In accordance with Miller, we hold that sentencing courts must have complete discretion to consider mitigating circumstances......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT