Washington v. Lee
| Docket Number | 92475-9 |
| Decision Date | 15 June 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
106 cases
-
State v. Jennings
...453 P.3d 696.¶ 36 In State v. Lee , the trial court excluded questions to a witness about a prior false rape accusation. 188 Wash.2d 473, 480, 396 P.3d 316 (2017). Applying the Hudlow test, this court found no error because the low probative value of the evidence was outweighed by the State......
-
State v. Ray
...776 (2018). "Credibility evidence is particularly relevant when the witness is central to the prosecution's case." State v. Lee , 188 Wash.2d 473, 488, 396 P.3d 316 (2017). "Where the credibility of the complaining witness is crucial, her possible motive to lie" is a relevant issue. State v......
-
State v. Bartch
...may include specific instances of lying, though ‘their admission is highly discretionary under ER 608(b).’ " State v. Lee, 188 Wash.2d 473, 488, 396 P.3d 316 (2017) (quoting State v. Kunze, 97 Wash. App. 832, 859, 988 P.2d 977 (1999) ). A reporting crime victim's false statement was held to......
-
State v. Blair
...the right of confrontation involving a limitation on the scope of cross-examination for an abuse of discretion. State v. Lee , 188 Wash.2d 473, 486, 396 P.3d 316 (2017). The "scope of such cross examination [remains] within the discretion of the trial court." State v. Russell , 125 Wash.2d ......
Get Started for Free