Washington v. Ollivier
| Docket Number | 86633-3 |
| Decision Date | 31 October 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
187 cases
-
State v. Howerton
...is less likely to be marred by self-interest.”Accordingly, “[c]itizen informants are deemed presumptively reliable.”State v. Ollivier, 178 Wash.2d 813, 850, 312 P.3d 1 (2013) (alteration in original) (quoting Gaddy, 152 Wash.2d at 64, 73, 93 P.3d 872 ). ¶ 13 But even if Parks receives no pr......
-
State v. Hatt
...the motion requesting the continuance, the defendant’s objection to the requested delay is waived. CrR 3.3(f)(2) ; State v. Ollivier, 178 Wash.2d 813, 824, 312 P.3d 1 (2013). If a defendant is not brought to trial within the applicable time period, the court must dismiss the charges with pr......
-
State v. Floyd
...before commencement of his first trial and asserted his right to a speedy trial on several occasions. See State v. Ollivier, 178 Wash.2d 813, ––––, 312 P.3d 1, 10 (Wash.2013). Furthermore, the trial court granted a number of continuances over Floyd's objections. ¶ 64 Proper analysis of the ......
-
State v. Hernandez
...rights to a speedy trial even though it was caused, in part by turnover at the Office of the Public Defender). In State v. Ollivier, 312 P.3d 1, 14 (Wash. 2013), the Washington Supreme Court found that a twenty-three-month delay did not violate the Defendant's right to a speedy trial, even ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
§ 12.8 Standard of Review Applied to Specific Rulings: Criminal Cases
...180 Wn.2d 543, 551, 326 P.3d 702 (2014) (determination of defendant's competency to stand trial); State v. Ollivier, 178 Wn.2d 813, 822-23, 312 P.3d 1 (2013) (grant or denial of continuance of a criminal trial), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 72 (2014); State v. Sublett, 176 Wn.2d 58, 69, 292 P.3......
-
Table of Cases
...91 Wn.2d 1013 (1979): 16.2(2) State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 217 P.3d 756 (2009): 11.3(3)(a), 11.7(2)(e) State v. Ollivier, 178 Wn.2d 813, 312 P.3d 1 (2013), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 72 (2014): 12.8(2), 12.8(4) State v. Olsen, 180 Wn.2d 468, 325 P.3d 187, cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 287 (2014)......