Washington v. Saintcalle
| Docket Number | 86257-5 |
| Decision Date | 01 August 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
107 cases
-
State v. Holmes
...that the jurors will judge as impartially and fairly as possible. Our democratic system cannot tolerate any less." State v. Saintcalle , 178 Wash. 2d 34, 49–50, 309 P.3d 326 (overruled in part on other grounds by Seattle v. Erickson , 188 Wash. 2d 721, 398 P.3d 1124 [2017] ), cert. denied, ......
-
Jamison v. McClendon
...140 S. Ct. at 1394. As other courts have noted, "racial discrimination remains rampant in jury selection." State v. Saintcalle , 178 Wash. 2d 34, 35, 309 P.3d 326 (2013), abrogated on other grounds by City of Seattle v. Erickson , 188 Wash. 2d 721, 398 P.3d 1124 (2017). Like any actor in ou......
-
State v. Jose A. B.
...constitutional provisions to demand other protections. Leading the way is the Washington Supreme Court's decision in State v. Saintcalle , 178 Wash. 2d 34, 309 P.3d 326, cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1113, 134 S. Ct. 831, 187 L. Ed. 2d 691 (2013), which upheld "the trial court's finding that the p......
-
State v. Andujar
...than the Federal Constitution. 103 N.J. at 522-23, 511 A.2d 1150 ; cf. Jefferson, 429 P.3d at 470 ; see also State v. Saintcalle, 178 Wash.2d 34, 309 P.3d 326, 335-37 (2013). C. The courts, not the parties, oversee jury selection. See Pellicer v. Saint Barnabas Hosp., 200 N.J. 22, 40, 974 A......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
EVALUATING JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF CONDUCT IN THE CURRENT POLITICAL AND SOCIAL CLIMATE: THE NEED TO STRENGTHEN IMPROPRIETY STANDARDS AND REMOVAL REMEDIES TO INCLUDE PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY HARM.
...must overcome, that a traffic stop was not based on an indefensible standard). (69) See MASS. SUPER. CT. R. 6. (70) State v. Saintcalle, 309 P.3d 326 (Wash. 2013). (71) Id. at 337. One of the important features about Saintcalle, was that the Court pointed out that not once since Batson had ......
-
Confronting the Bias Dichotomy in Jury Selection
...the lay jury is what stands between the defendant and the state’s desire to punish. Thus, the jurors 2. State v. Saintcalle, 309 P.3d 326, 348 (Wash. 2013) (González, J., concurring). 3. See Symposium Objective and Purpose , LSU LAW, https://www.law. lsu.edu/symposium/ [https://perma.cc/6D4......
-
Sacrificing Secrecy
...of such behavior.'" (quoting United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 624 F. Supp. 1276, 1369 (S.D.N.Y. 1985))); State v. Saintcalle, 309 P.3d 326, 335 (Wash. 2013) ("It is now socially unacceptable to be overtly racist."), abrogated by City of Seattle v. Erickson, 398 P.3d 1124 (Wash. 2017).......
-
Table of Cases
...overruled on other grounds, State v. Hill, 123 Wn.2d 641, 870 P.2d 313 (1994): 23.2(1), 23.3, 23.7(3) State v. Saintcalle, 178 Wn.2d 34, 309 P.3d 326, cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 831 (2013): 12.8(3) State v. Salinas, 119 Wn.2d 192, 829 P.2d 1068 (1992): 12.8(14) State v. Sandefer, 79 Wn. App. ......
Get Started for Free
1 provisions
-
Chapter 317, AB 2542 – Criminal procedure: discrimination
...current law, as interpreted by the high courts, is insufficient to address discrimination in our justice system. (State v. Saintcalle, 178 Wash. 2d 34, 35 (2013); Ellis Harrison, 891 F.3rd 1160, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 2018) (Nguyen, J., concurring), reh'g en banc granted Jan. 30, 2019; Turner v.......