Washington v. Strickland, No. 81-5379

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., HENDERSON, ANDERSON, and THOMAS A. CLARK
Citation679 F.2d 23
PartiesDavid Leroy WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles E. STRICKLAND, Superintendent; Jim Smith, Attorney General, State of Florida; Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees. . Unit B *
Decision Date14 May 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-5379

Page 23

679 F.2d 23
David Leroy WASHINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles E. STRICKLAND, Superintendent; Jim Smith, Attorney
General, State of Florida; Louie L. Wainwright,
Secretary of Department of Corrections,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 81-5379.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Unit B *
May 14, 1982.

Appeal from United States District Court, Southern District of Florida; C. Clyde Atkins, Chief Judge.

Richard E. Shapiro, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.

Calvin Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 23, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 673 F.2d 879).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., HENDERSON, ANDERSON, and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges. **

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

---------------

* Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(3) of Public Law 96-452-October 14, 1980.

** Judges Vance and Hatchett are recused and did not participate in this decision.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Strickland v. Washington, No. 82-1554
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 14 Mayo 1984
    ...panel decision was itself vacated when Unit B of the former Fifth Circuit, now the Eleventh Circuit, decided to rehear the case en banc. 679 F.2d 23 (1982). The full Court of Appeals developed its own framework for analyzing ineffective assistance claims and reversed the judgment of the Dis......
  • Alvord v. Wainwright, No. 81-366 Civ-T-BK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • 5 Mayo 1983
    ...B of the former Fifth Circuit ordered rehearing en banc in Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879 (5th Cir. Unit B), rehearing granted, 679 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), a case presenting important issues underlying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel asserted by petitioner her......
  • Martin v. State of Tex., No. 81-2428
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 27 Diciembre 1982
    ...supra, 446 U.S. at 341-42, 100 S.Ct. at 1714; Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879, 884 n. 1 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 679 F.2d 23 (5th 4 If Martin carries his burden at the evidentiary hearing, the court should order relief in the form of an out-of-time appeal by whatever proced......
  • Cepulonis v. Ponte, No. 82-1574
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • 1 Noviembre 1982
    ...v. Baynes, 687 F.2d 659, 669-71 (3d Cir.1982). Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879, 895-901 & nn. 11-26, rehearing en banc ordered, 679 F.2d 23 (5th 5 Appellant's first claim is largely a restatement of the ineffective assistance argument we have already rejected. Insofar as appellant al......
4 cases
  • Strickland v. Washington, No. 82-1554
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 14 Mayo 1984
    ...panel decision was itself vacated when Unit B of the former Fifth Circuit, now the Eleventh Circuit, decided to rehear the case en banc. 679 F.2d 23 (1982). The full Court of Appeals developed its own framework for analyzing ineffective assistance claims and reversed the judgment of the Dis......
  • Alvord v. Wainwright, No. 81-366 Civ-T-BK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • 5 Mayo 1983
    ...B of the former Fifth Circuit ordered rehearing en banc in Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879 (5th Cir. Unit B), rehearing granted, 679 F.2d 23 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), a case presenting important issues underlying the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel asserted by petitioner her......
  • Martin v. State of Tex., No. 81-2428
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 27 Diciembre 1982
    ...supra, 446 U.S. at 341-42, 100 S.Ct. at 1714; Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879, 884 n. 1 (5th Cir.), reh'g en banc granted, 679 F.2d 23 (5th 4 If Martin carries his burden at the evidentiary hearing, the court should order relief in the form of an out-of-time appeal by whatever proced......
  • Cepulonis v. Ponte, No. 82-1574
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • 1 Noviembre 1982
    ...v. Baynes, 687 F.2d 659, 669-71 (3d Cir.1982). Washington v. Strickland, 673 F.2d 879, 895-901 & nn. 11-26, rehearing en banc ordered, 679 F.2d 23 (5th 5 Appellant's first claim is largely a restatement of the ineffective assistance argument we have already rejected. Insofar as appellant al......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT