Waters v. Zant
| Citation | 11 F.3d 139 |
| Decision Date | 22 December 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-8935,88-8935 |
| Parties | Eurus Kelly WATERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit) |
James M. Doyle, Deputy Chief Counsel, Public Counsel Div., the Com. of Mass., Committee for Public Counsel Services, Boston, MA and Wade W. Herring, II, Savannah, GA, for petitioner-appellant.
Paula Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, GA, for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, No. 86-0130; B. Avant Edenfield, Chief Judge.
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges. *
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
* Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Thomas A. Clark has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(c).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Waters v. Thomas
...and dissenting in part). We granted the State of Georgia's suggestion for rehearing en banc, vacating the panel opinion. Waters v. Zant, 11 F.3d 139 (11th Cir.1993). I. DENIAL OF GUILT STAGE We affirm the denial of guilt stage relief for the reasons set out in the panel opinion, 979 F.2d at......
- U.S. ex rel Doe v. DeGregorio
- United States ex rel. Hood v. Satory Global, Inc.
-
Conner v. State, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
...1324. The court concluded that there existed no tactical reason to make this argument to the jury. Id. We also find that Waters v. Zant, 11 F.3d 139 (11th Cir. 1993), does not provide support for the defendant's contention. That decision was vacated and reheard en banc. See Waters v. Thomas......