Watkins v. Halco Engineering, Inc., 820546
Decision Date | 11 March 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 820546,820546 |
Citation | 300 S.E.2d 761,225 Va. 97 |
Parties | Wesley WATKINS v. HALCO ENGINEERING, INC., et al. Record |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
J. Hunt Brasfield, Alexandria (Ashcraft & Gerel, Alexandria, on brief), for appellant.
Mary Louise Kramer, Richmond (Roger L. Williams, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, Richmond, on brief), for appellees.
Before CARRICO, C.J., and COCHRAN, POFF, COMPTON, THOMPSON, * STEPHENSON and RUSSELL, JJ.
In this workmen's compensation case, the sole issue is whether the Industrial Commission properly refused to order the employer to pay for psychiatric services rendered the claimant following a back injury.
Appellant Wesley Watkins sustained injuries to his lower back in an industrial accident in January of 1979. He fell while working in Arlington as a welder for appellee Halco Engineering, Inc. The injury was accepted as compensable by the employer and its insurer, appellee Aetna Insurance Company (collectively, the employer). Pursuant to awards of the Commission, the claimant subsequently received compensation for periods of temporary total disability caused by his injury, diagnosed as a back sprain.
Because of persistent back pain, Watkins was unable to perform the duties of a welder after the accident. In about January of 1980, the claimant, age 32, enrolled in Northern Virginia Community College, with the encouragement of his physician, "to carry out a long-standing desire to achieve a college degree" and to further his education so that he could qualify for less strenuous employment. At college, however, he was "unable to sustain interest and attention, sometimes because of back pain ... at other times, because he [felt] depressed or hopeless." His grades were poor he dropped courses, and he felt "increasingly like a failure."
Due to these school difficulties, claimant's treating orthopedic surgeon referred him in June of 1981 to Dr. William F. Cavender, an Alexandria psychiatrist. Upon examination, Cavender diagnosed claimant's condition as "Adjustment Disorder with Academic Inhibition ... manifested by depression and inability to study." Cavender reported that Watkins suffered stress caused by "ongoing pain and loss of work ability resulting from the accident."
During the October 1981 hearing before a deputy commissioner on claimant's demand that the employer pay for Cavender's services, the psychiatrist testified about the cause of Watkins' condition as follows:
Cavender then instituted a course of treatment, which he described as follows:
At the time of the hearing, Cavender's bill amounted to $1600, based on a rate of $65 per 50-minute session of "individual psychotherapy."
In a November 1981 opinion, the deputy commissioner concluded that the "adjustment disorder with academic inhibition" suffered by Watkins was not causally related to the claimant's accident. Noting Cavender testified that his principal goal was to assist Watkins in satisfactorily completing college and that claimant's condition was one experienced by the general population, the deputy found that "the psychiatric treatment and psychotherapy" provided by Cavender was "neither reasonable nor necessary medical treatment related to claimant's industrial accident but merely treatment for an ordinary disease of life." Upon review, the full Commission unanimously agreed with the deputy's decision that the employer was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Berglund Chevrolet, Inc. v. Landrum
...drawn from proven facts" — for inferences, like historic facts, are likewise "equally binding on appeal." Watkins v. Halco Eng'g, Inc., 225 Va. 97, 101, 300 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1983); see also Hall v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 41 Va.App. 835, 843, 589 S.E.2d 484, 488 (2003). Such deference is w......
-
Vital Link, Inc. v. Hope
...fact that there may be evidence to support a contrary finding." Id. at 209, 648 S.E.2d at 323 (referencing Watkins v. Halco Eng’g., Inc., 225 Va. 97, 101, 300 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1983) )."The opinion of the treating physician is entitled to great weight, although the commission is not required......
-
McWhorter v. Williamsburg/James City County and Community Action Agency, Inc., Record No. 2063-07-1 (Va. App. 5/6/2008), Record No. 2063-07-1
...of the evidence . . . that the disability was causally related to his industrial accident." (citing Watkins v. Halco Eng'g, Inc., 225 Va. 97, 101, 300 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1983); Ins. Mgmt. Corp. v. Daniels, 222 Va. 434, 438-39, 281 S.E.2d 847, 849 (1981)); see also Volvo Truck Corp. v. Hedge, ......
-
Layne v. Crist Elec. Contractor, Inc.
...inferences, legitimately drawn from proven facts, are equally binding on appeal.’ ” Id. (quoting Watkins v. Halco Eng'g, Inc., 225 Va. 97, 101, 300 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1983) ).In this case, claimant was an employee of Crist Electrical Contractor, Inc. (employer), which was a subcontractor perf......