Watson v. State
| Docket Number | CR-13-668 |
| Decision Date | 08 May 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Mancia v. State
...Mancia's case and this court has rejected the argument that Martinez and Trevino require appointment of counsel. In Watson v. State, 2014 Ark. 203, at 11, 444 S.W.3d 835, 843, we explained:In March 2012, the United States Supreme Court decided Martinez, holding in part that “when a State re......
-
Walden v. State
...counsel cannot be considered ineffective for failing to make an objection or an argument that is without merit. Watson v. State , 2014 Ark. 203, at 8, 444 S.W.3d 835, 841 ; Anthony v. State , 2014 Ark. 195, at 15 (per curiam).Without providing any particular argument concerning the point, W......
-
Flemons v. State
...409, 64 S.W.3d 728 (2002). Counsel is not ineffective for failing to make a motion or argument that is without merit. Watson v. State , 2014 Ark. 203, 444 S.W.3d 835. Had appellate counsel raised the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence that had been raised at trial, the challenge w......
-
Roberts v. State
...Court of the United States in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Watson v. State , 2014 Ark. 203, at 3, 444 S.W.3d 835, 838–39. In asserting ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland , the petitioner first must demonstrate that counsel’s......
Get Started for Free