Watson v. State
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BROWN, J. |
| Citation | Watson v. State, 217 Ala. 164, 115 So. 101 (Ala. 1928) |
| Decision Date | 12 January 1928 |
| Docket Number | 5 Div. 966 |
| Parties | WATSON v. STATE. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; S.L. Brewer, Judge.
Horance Watson, alias Horace Watson, was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals. Affirmed.
See also, 114 So. 926.
Frank M. de Graffenried, of Seale, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary.
The evidence offered by the state shows without conflict that the deceased, Thomas E. Davis, near midnight on the third Sunday night in October, 1926, was called from his bed by two men on a pretense that they had a truck stalled on the road near deceased's home and wanted his help to get the truck started. They asked for matches and requested the loan of an ax, which was procured by a young brother of the deceased and delivered to one of the men, who is described as "a low chunky fellow," and the other as "a tall, slim fellow," resembling, in this respect, the defendant. The young brother of the deceased and the "low, chunky fellow," after procuring the ax, started back to the road to where the truck was supposed to be stalled, but according to the boy's story, instead of a truck, they came upon an automobile with another man in it. The "low, chunky fellow" then told deceased's brother to go to a house some distance away and see if he could not borrow a lantern. When the boy returned to the road where he had left the men and the automobile they were gone, and on returning to the house the deceased and the tall man had disappeared. Some few days thereafter the dead body of Davis was found floating in "Halawaka creek," or what is also called "the back water of Bartlett's Ferry pond," near Harry Prince's store, a distance of 35 miles from the home of Davis, where deceased was last seen alive. There was a barbed wire twisted around his neck, and, as some of the witnesses describe it, what "looked like a bruised place right across his head"; one eye was popped out and the body was swollen.
Dr. Bruce, who examined the body, testified that the skull was fractured and that a hemorrhage through the mouth resulted from the injury. He gave it as his opinion that the wound on the head was caused by "powerful blow from some noncutting blunt object," and that death resulted either from the injury or from water suffocation, or from both the injury and suffocation.
A short time before the disappearance of Davis, as the state's evidence tended to show, the defendant and one Edge had been arrested on a charge of robbery, and on their preliminary trial before a committing magistrate, resulting in holding them to await the action of the grand jury, the deceased testified as a witness for the state. Edge and another witness testified that defendant, while in jail on the robbery charge, stated in their presence, referring to Davis, "if he ever hit the ground he was going to kill him," and about three weeks thereafter and before Davis disappeared, defendant was released on bail.
Testimony was adduced by the state going to show that the defendant and his brothers, up to within about a year before Davis disappeared, had lived in the community of the alleged crime and were well known; that the defendant and one of his brothers were seen in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Alabama Power Co. v. Jackson
... ... where it was placed." ... In ... Hagerstown & Frederick Railway Company v. State of ... Maryland, etc., 139 Md. 507, 115 A. 783, 784, 19 A.L.R ... 797, 799, 800, 801, the general rule as to liability for ... maintenance of ... 543, 86 So. 469; Rowe v. Alabama Power Co ... (Ala.Sup.) 167 So. 324; 22 C.J. p. 554, § 655; 1 ... Whart.Ev. § 511; Watson v. State, 217 Ala. 164, 115 ... [166 So. 696.] Baugh v. State, 218 Ala. 87, 117 So. 426; ... Diamond v. State, 219 Ala. 674, 123 So. 55; ... ...
-
Rowe v. Alabama Power Co.
... ... evidence is not attainable, the opinion of a witness, derived ... from observation, is admissible." Mayberry v ... State, 107 Ala. 64, 18 So. 219, 220; Watson v ... State, 217 Ala. 164, 115 So. 101; Baugh v ... State, 218 Ala. 87, 117 So. 426; Diamond v ... State, ... ...
-
Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.
...the opinion of a witness, derived from observation, is admissible. Mayberry v. State, 107 Ala. 64, 18 So. 219, 220; Watson v. State, 217 Ala. 164, 115 So. 101; Baugh v. State, 218 Ala. 87, 117 So. 426; Diamond v. State, 219 Ala. 674, 123 So. 55; Stinson v. State, 223 Ala. 327, 135 So. 571; ......
-
Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Steverson
... ... attainable, the opinion of a witness derived from observation ... is admissible." Mayberry v. State, 107 Ala. 64, ... 18 So. 219; Watson v. State, 217 Ala. 164, 115 So ... 101. Under this exception to the general rule, it was ... permissible to ... ...