Watson v. Thurber

Decision Date15 July 1863
Citation11 Mich. 457
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
PartiesLeonard N. Watson v. Louise Thurber and others

Heard July 13, 1863 [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]

Appeal in Chancery from Ingham Circuit.

The bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage given by said Louise Thurber, on her sole property, to secure a debt of Caleb Thurber, her husband. The mortgage bore date January 6, 1857, and its acknowledgment was taken by John Marble, a Justice of the Peace, who certified that she acknowledged, separate and apart from her husband, that she had executed it freely, and without fear or compulsion from any one. A decree of foreclosure having been taken by default, Mrs. Thurber afterwards obtained an order opening the decree, and giving her leave to defend. She then filed her answer, in which she admitted the making the mortgage, but alleged that the same was signed by her under protest, that she did not execute the same freely, and only after assurance of Watson and her husband that her property and rights therein should not be disturbed in consequence of the making thereof. In reference to this defense the following evidence was taken:

Louise Thurber, the defendant, testified: "At the time of the execution of the mortgage, Mr. Watson and John Marble were present; the mortgage was given for the purpose of securing the payment of a debt due by Mr. Thurber to Mr. Watson, of about one hundred and fifty dollars; the debt was for money loaned Mr. Thurber; I do not remember when the loan was made; I first knew of the existence of the indebtedness about the time the mortgage was given; Mr. Thurber told me of it; the way he came to tell me of it was this: He had got some money of Mr. Watson, and had given him a mortgage of his own property to secure the payment of it; I learned that it had been given from Thurber and Mr. Watson both; Mr. Watson brought it back; it did not suit him in some way; when Mr. Thurber told me of the indebtedness, he asked me to sign a mortgage on my property; this was the same day the mortgage was executed; Mr. Thurber had never asked me to give this mortgage previous to that day that I remember of; I do not recollect whether any person was present when he asked me to give the mortgage; I think no one was present; don't know in which room it was; when he asked me to sign the mortgage, I told him I did not think Mr. Watson needed a mortgage on my property, and I was utterly opposed to giving it; Mr. Thurber urged me very hard to give it, and told me if I would my property should not be touched for it; I still refused to sign it; I did not say I would not execute it; the conversation about the execution of the mortgage commenced in the forenoon; they came to our house, I should think, about 8 or 9 o'clock in the morning; after I told Mr. Thurber I did not want to sign the mortgage, he and Mr. Watson urged me very hard to execute it; I once told Mr. Watson I would not sign it; I do not remember what reply he made to this; he talked to Mr. Thurber a spell; Mr. Watson and myself, at the time he was urging me to sign the mortgage, were in the sitting-room; Mr. Thurber thought that, rather than to have a quarrel with the neighbors, I had better sign the mortgage, and I did so; I suppose he meant Mr. Watson, by neighbors that he spoke of; he did not say who would make the disturbance, but I took it to be Mr. Watson he meant; I think Mr. Watson did not come back again, but I cannot say for certain; there was a good deal said that I can't remember; I think Mr. Thurber and Mr. Watson each came to talk with me about it alone; I do not remember of any person being there except Mr. Marble; they stayed till they worried me out, teasing me to execute this mortgage; Mr. Thurber did the most of the talking with me about it; the reason he gave me for signing it was that he should have a disturbance, and would be made trouble; do not know that he gave any other reasons; he told me he would pay it up without my having any trouble about it; I think the debt was to be paid within the year; Mr. Thurber had more than one conversation with me about it; I remember his taking me into the other room to talk about it as many as three times, and I refused to sign it; this was a room adjoining the one where Mr. Watson was; the reason I gave Mr. Thurber for not signing the mortgage, was that I did not want my property endangered; I told Mr. Watson I did not want to sign it, as I had a family of small children, and was afraid my property would be taken for it, and leave them destitute; Mr. Watson said he did not think there was any danger, as he thought Mr. Thurber would be able to pay it up; he said he should not be in any hurry for the money; he said the money did not belong to him, and he would not be in any hurry for it; I urged Mr. Watson to take the security Mr. Thurber had given him, and let my property be; I signed the mortgage, I think, as late as noon, and perhaps later; I cannot tell the time; I refused a long time to sign it, and did not say at all I would do it; Mr. John Marble took the acknowledgment of the mortgage; Mr. Marble asked me if I executed it freely of my own accord; I told him I did not; he asked me again; he might have worded it a little different--I can't remember; I told him the second time I had not done it freely; Mr. Marble dropped the mortgage upon the table, and said: Mr. Watson, it isn't worth a straw; I do not remember the reply Mr. Watson made to this; Mr. Marble then asked me if I did it through fear of Mr. Thurber; I told him I did not do it because I was afraid of Mr. Thurber--that I did it more to keep peace in the family; I do not know what Mr. Marble then said to me; Mr. Marble asked me some other questions, but what it was I cannot tell; I was so excited at the time I did not remember it; Mr. Watson said he would risk it; I do not recollect of anything further; the parties soon after separated; I am still the owner of the premises described in the mortgage, and in the occupation of them; I should not have said that I did not say I would not execute the mortgage, for I remember now that I did tell them both several times that I would not sign it; my statement above, that I did not say that I would not execute it, is incorrect; Mr. Watson was present when Mr. Marble asked me if I executed it freely; I cannot say whether Mr. Thurber was present or not, but it seems to me he was sitting by the window; at no time during the taking of the acknowledgment was I alone with Mr. Marble; Mr. Watson, I am sure, was present, and think Mr. Thurber was too; Mr. Thurber gave as a reason why my property should not be touched, that he would pay the debt; I understood that if the debt was not paid Mr. Watson could foreclose the mortgage, and sell my property if he was a mind to; I do not know that Mr. Thurber told me what trouble he meant when he urged me to sign it, but I understood it to be in relation to the borrowed money. When I signed the mortgage mentioned in the bill of complaint, I expected it to go into Mr. Watson's hands for the purpose of securing the loan."

Caleb Thurber testified: "I was present at the execution of the mortgage to Watson; I was present at the time of the taking the acknowledgment by Doctor Marble; I do not remember that I was out of the room at any time during the examination of Mrs. Thurber by Mr. Marble in reference to the execution of the mortgage; Mr. Watson was also present; this mortgage was given for my debt; I heard the conversation between Mr Marble and Mrs. Thurber and Mr. Watson, at the time the acknowledgment was taken; I heard the questions propounded by Mr. Marble to Mrs. Thurber in reference to the acknowledgment; Mr. Marble asked her if she executed the paper freely; her reply was that she did not do it freely; I think the doctor asked her if she was afraid of me the reason she did not execute it freely, and she replied that she could not say that she was afraid of me, or something to that effect; I think the next move that was made the doctor threw the paper on the table and said that it was not worth a straw; there were some remarks made by the doctor and Mr. Watson; Mr. Marble was delicate about acknowledging the mortgage; there was some argument about it between them. Mr. Watson finally said if he would execute the acknowledgment he would risk it; I do not know as anything more was done or said; Mrs. Thurber appeared a good deal excited during the time the negotiations were going on; Mrs. Thurber executed the mortgage at the solicitation of myself and Mr. Watson; there was a good deal said, and it took a good deal of persuasion on our part to get her to do it; from the time I proposed to her to sign the mortgage until she did sign it, I should think it was three hours. One reason she gave why she would not sign the mortgage was that Mr. Watson already had a mortgage on my property sufficient to secure him; another was that she did not want to have her property incumbered; Mr. Watson and myself both told her she should not be hurt for the debt; I told her she should not have the debt to pay, and Watson told her he did not think there was any danger of her having it to pay; when I said I was present at the taking of the acknowledgment of the mortgage, I meant I was in the same room. This room is in the southeast corner of the house fronting the street. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Jenne v. Marble
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • October 16, 1877
    ...husband to buy land, the title to which he took in his own name, was treated after his death as if it had been a gift to him. In Watson v. Thurber 11 Mich. 457, it was also that a woman could mortgage her own property to secure her husband's debts; though it was held in De Vries v. Conklin ......
  • Wendland v. Citizens Commercial & Sav. Bank
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • September 5, 1979
    ...371 (1924), with Monroe State Savings Bank v. Orloff, 232 Mich. 486, 205 N.W. 596 (1925). Nevertheless, beginning with Watson v. Thurber, 11 Mich. 457, 469 (1863), Michigan courts have also recognized the principle that "(there) is no legal objection to the making by a wife of a mortgage to......
  • Kitchell v. Mudgett
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 19, 1877
    ...purpose of securing her husband's debt (Emery v. Lord 26 Mich. 431 and notes). and yet she can make a mortgage for that purpose. Watson v. Thurber 11 Mich. 457; Damon v. Deeves 57 Mich. 247, 23 N.W. 798; but see Harvey v. Galloway 48 Mich. 531, 12 N.W. 689. For other cases of constructive n......
  • Westervelt v. Baker
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • September 23, 1898
    ...Buys, 44 Mich. 80; De Vries v. Conklin, 22 Mich. 255; Willard v. Eastham, 15 Gray [Mass.] 328; Ankeney v. Hannon, 147 U.S. 118; Watson v. Thurber, 11 Mich. 457; Edwards Schoeneman, 104 Ill. 278; Woolsey v. Brown, 74 N.Y. 82; Corn Exchange Ins. Co. v. Babcock, 42 N.Y. 613; Owen v. Cawley, 36......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT