Wattison v. Carter, et al.

Docket Number10-16778
Decision Date13 February 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4081 cases
  • Quiroga v. Graves
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • March 15, 2018
    ...v. Bojorquez, 866 F.2d 1135 (9th Cir. 1989); Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 807 (9th Cir. 1995). As discussed by the Ninth Circuit in Watison v. Carter:"A retaliation claim has five elements. Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009). First, the plaintiff must allege that the ret......
  • Alarcon v. Davey
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • May 9, 2017
    ...a First Amendment right to file grievances against prison officials and to be free from retaliation for doing so. Waitson v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1114-1115 (9th Cir. 2012); Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir.2009). A retaliation claim has five elements. Id. at 1114. First, the ......
  • Quiroga v. Graves
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • August 20, 2018
    ...v. Bojorquez, 866 F.2d 1135 (9th Cir. 1989); Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 807 (9th Cir. 1995). As discussed by the Ninth Circuit in Watison v. Carter:"A retaliation claim has five elements. Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009). First, the plaintiff must allege that the ret......
  • Mwasi v. Corcoran State Prison, Case: 1:13-cv-00695-DAD-JLT (PC)
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • May 20, 2016
    ...for violation of the First Amendment by retaliating against Plaintiff for his engaging in protected conduct. See Waitson v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1114-1115 (9th Cir. 2012); Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir.2009); Rhodes v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 568 (9th Cir. 2005). viii. Dr.......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Prisoners' Rights
    • United States
    • Georgetown Law Journal No. 110-Annual Review, August 2022
    • August 1, 2022
    ...977-78 (8th Cir. 2017) (8th Amendment not violated when disruptive prisoner strapped to restraint board for 4 hours); Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (8th Amendment not violated when guard rubbed thigh against prisoner’s while prisoner sat on toilet); Redmond v. Crowt......
  • Recent Legal Developments
    • United States
    • Sage Criminal Justice Review No. 38-2, June 2013
    • June 1, 2013
    ...AG Order No. RIN 1105-AB34. Retrieved January 21,2013, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/programs/pdfs/prea_final_rule.pdfWatison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2012).Westoff, M. (2008). An examination of prisoners’ constitutional right to health care: Theory and practice.Health Lawyer,20, ......
  • Part two: case summaries by major topic.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 57, October 2013
    • October 1, 2013
    ...in his official capacity. (Cherokee Casino, Rogers County Jail, Oklahoma) U.S. Appeals Court NUDITY VIEW BY STAFF Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2012). A state inmate brought a pro se [section] 1983 action against prison officials, alleging violations of his federal constitution......
  • Part two: case summaries by major topic.
    • United States
    • Detention and Corrections Caselaw Quarterly No. 57, October 2013
    • October 1, 2013
    ...to call an attorney. (Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff, Louisiana) U.S. Appeals Court IN FORMA PAUPER'S RETALIATION Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2012). A state inmate brought a pro se [section] 1983 action against prison officials, alleging violations of his federal constitutio......
  • Get Started for Free