Watts v. Commonwealth

Decision Date04 December 1907
Citation56 S.E. 223,106 Va. 851
PartiesWATTS. v. COMMONWEALTH.
CourtVirginia Supreme Court

Licenses — Occupation Tax — Labor Agent —Statutes—Construction.

A person employed by a railway construction company as a day laborer was sent to a city to employ additional labor. He hired several laborers and was endeavoring to induce others to enter its service. Held, that he was not a labor agent, within Va. Code 1904, p. 2247, imposing a fine on one conducting the business of a labor agent without having first obtained a license therefor; the statute requiring a strict construction as against the state, because it imposes a tax and is intended to reach persons who for compensation conduct the business of employing laborers for others.

Appeal from Corporation Court of Danville.

Albert Watts was convicted of conducting business as a labor agent without a license, and he brings error. Reversed.

Daniel & Harper, for plaintiff In error.

The Attorney General, for the Commonwealth.

WHITTLE, J. This writ of error is to a judgment of the corporation court of Danville convicting the plaintiff in error, Albert Watts, of conducting business as a labor agent in that city without a license.

The prosecution was had under section 128 of the tax bill, which reads: "Any person who hires or contracts with laborers, male or female, to be employed by persons other than himself, shall be deemed to be a labor agent;and no person shall engage In such business without having first obtained a license therefor. Every person who shall without a license conduct business as a labor agent, shall pay a fine of not less than one hundred dollars, nor more than five hundred dollars." Appendix, Va. Code 1904, p. 2247.

The following are the agreed facts in the case: The Nave Ryan Curtis Construction Company is a corporation chartered under the laws of the sta, te of Ohio, and duly licensed to conduct its business of general contracting in this state. The company is engaged upon construction work for the Southern Railway Company's new double-track line in Pittsylvania county. Watts was employed by the company as a day laborer on its work, and rendered such service as was required of him, Including the manual labor commonly performed by that class of employes on work of similar character. The exigencies of the operation demanding additional labor, Watts was sent to Danville by his employer to secure it. He had succeeded in hiring several laborers for the company, and was endeavoring to induce others to enter its service, when he was arrested, and prosecuted and convicted of an alleged violation of section 128, supra.

It thus appears that the single question presented by the record for our determination is, whether or not the plaintiff In error was engaged in the business of a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 5, 1920
    ... ... 68; In re Yot Sang (D.C.) 75 F. 983; ... Birmingham-Tuscaloosa Ry. v. Carpenter, 194 Ala ... 141, 69 So. 626; ... [86 So. 67] Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Alden Coal Co., ... 251 Pa. 134, 96 A. 246, L.R.A.1916F, 154, and note; City ... Council of Montgomery v. Kelly, 142 Ala. 552, ... which the activity is taxed. It must be levied on that which ... is in fact one's occupation. Texas Co. v. Amos ... (Fla.) 81 So. 471; Watts v. Com., 106 Va. 851, ... 56 S.E. 223, Ann.Cas.1914B, 738; Lane v. Rowan ... County, 139 N.C. 443, 52 S.E. 140; State v. Anniston ... Rolling ... ...
  • Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. Redd
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1918
    ...for a layman or a justice of the peace to have so construed it. They suggest, as plausible, that: "In the light of the decision in Watts v. Commonwealth, the amendment appears to mean, 'every agent of any person who * * * hires * * * laborers, ' and not 'every agent of any person who * * * ......
  • Walton v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1948
    ...438, 41 S.E. 858. Of incidental interest is Derrick v. Commonwealth, 122 Va. 906, 95 S.E. 392, L.R. A.1918D, 284, and Watts v. Commonwealth, 106 Va. 851, 56 S.E. 223, Ann.Cas.l914B, 738. In Restatement of the Law, Conflict of Laws, at page 244, "doing business" within the purview of foreign......
  • Walton v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1948
    ... ... See Goldsberry Carter, 100 Va. 438, 41 S.E. 858 ...         Of incidental interest is Derrick Commonwealth, 122 Va. 906, 95 S.E. 392, L.R.A. 1918D, 284, and Watts Commonwealth, ... 106 Va. 851, 56 S.E. 223, Ann. Cas. 1914B, 738. In Restatement of the Law, Conflict of Laws, at page 244, "doing business" within the purview of foreign corporation law is defined as "doing a series of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT