Watts v. Equitable Mut. Life Ass'n of Waterloo
Decision Date | 13 April 1900 |
Citation | 82 N.W. 441,111 Iowa 90 |
Parties | WATTS v. EQUITABLE MUT. LIFE ASS'N OF WATERLOO. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Polk county; Thomas F. Stevenson, Judge.
Action in equity upon a certificate of life insurance, in which the plaintiff is named as the beneficiary. There was a decree for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals. Affirmed.Bowen & Brockett and Baker & Ball, for appellant.
F. W. Paschal, for appellee.
On the 28th day of September, 1892, Dr. Jackson Watts held a certificate of membership in St. Stephen's Brotherhood, a mutual insurance company then doing business in this state. The plaintiff was the beneficiary named in the certificate. The defendant was at that time a corporation engaged in the same business. On the day named a written agreement was entered into by St. Stephen's Brotherhood and the defendant for a consolidation of the two companies. In this agreement the defendant stipulated to enter into a contract with each holder of a brotherhood certificate or policy to assume all liability on said policy; and on the same day a written agreement was entered into by Dr. Jackson Watts and the defendant as follows: The St. Stephen's Brotherhood certificate was issued to Watts in October, 1889, when he was 49 years of age, and the rate of assessment was therein fixed at 98 cents per $1,000. By the articles of incorporation of the defendant, the rate of assessment was fixed at $1.12 per $1,000 for a person 49 years old, and at the rate of $1.28 per $1,000 for a person 52 years of age,--the age of Watts at the time of his contract with defendant. It is contended by the appellant that the contract of consolidation above referred to, and the contract of reinsurance with Dr. Watts, are ultra vires and void, and that the plaintiff cannot have the relief sought, for this reason.
As to the contract of reinsurance, it is claimed:
(1) That no medical examination was made of Watts, as required by defendant's by-laws. This is true. But a corporation may waive the provisions of its by-laws, and the defendant must be held to have done so in this case. Morrison v. Insurance Co., 59 Wis. 162, 18 N. W. 13;Weiberg v. Association (Minn.) 76 N. W. 37.
(2) That, by the terms of the certificate, Dr. Watts' assessments were limited to 12 per year, which limit was in violation of the law governing defendant in relation thereto. This contention of the defendant cannot be sustained, for the reason that we do not so construe the certificate. We think no limit is therein placed upon the number of assessments for death during the year. If the defendant misconstrued its rights under the contract, it certainly cannot be heard to say that its contract is ultra vires for that reason.
(3) That the rate of assessment provided for in the certificate adopted by it was lower than required by its articles of incorporation. This point we will consider later on.
It may be conceded for the purpose of this case that neither the articles of incorporation nor the by-laws of the defendant gave its board of directors any express power or authority to make such a contract of consolidation as it did, or gave it express power to reinsure Watts on the terms it did. In the reinsurance of Watts, his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express
... ... the insured should be entitled to "an equitable ... participation in the funds of the company in ... This is not sufficient. New York Life Insurance Co. v ... Street, Tex.Civ.App., 265 ... Greenlaw v. Aroostook County Patrons' Mut. Fire Ins ... Co., 117 Me. 514, 105 A. 116; ... v. Street, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W. 397; Watts v ... Mutual Life Ass'n, 111 Iowa 90, 82 N.W ... ...
-
Fuqua Bus Line v. Pink
... ... Greenlaw v. Aroostook County Patrons' Mut ... Fire Ins. Co., 117 Me. 514, 105 A. 116, ; New ... York Life Ins. Co. v. Street, Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W ... 97; Watts v. Equitable Mutual Life Ass'n, 111 ... Iowa 90, ... ...
-
Fuqua Bus Line v. Pink
...Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 117 Me. 514, 105 A. 116, 117; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Street, Tex. Civ. App., 265 S.W. 397; Watts v. Equitable Mutual Life Ass'n, 111 Iowa 90, 82 N.W. 441; Lee v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co., Mo. App., 238 S.W. 858; Dwinnell v. Kramer, 87 Minn. 392, 92 N.W. The United......
-
Weber v. Ancient Order of Pyramids
...By executing the contract, defendant waived the prerequisites it prescribed as necessary to induce it to become obligated. Watts v. Ins. Co., 111 Iowa 90; McElwain v. Ins. Co., 50 A.D. 63, 63 N.Y.S. Defendant next sets up that its by-laws require that all benefit certificates issued shall b......