Way v. Lewis

Decision Date09 March 1874
CitationWay v. Lewis, 115 Mass. 26 (Mass. 1874)
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
PartiesJohn M. Way v. Charles H. Lewis & another

Suffolk Contract on a recognizance, in which the defendant Lewis was principal, and the defendant Judson Murdock was surety.

At the trial in the Superior Court, jury waived, before Putnam, J it appeared that the plaintiff commenced an action on a promissory note against the defendant Lewis, returnable at January term of the Superior Court, 1872; that the defendant appeared and filed an answer, but was afterwards defaulted and judgment was entered for the plaintiff in June following on which an execution was issued; that the plaintiff commenced another action returnable at the same term of court, on the same note against John Lewis and one Downing, who were indorsers on said note, and in June following obtained judgment against them on which executions issued; that in the said case against the defendant Charles H. Lewis, the plaintiff caused said Lewis to be arrested on June 20, 1872, on execution, and that the defendants in this suit entered into the recognizance upon which the present action is brought, by which they agreed to pay the sum of eight hundred dollars unless said Lewis should within thirty days from the time of his arrest deliver himself up for examination, as provided by law. It also appeared that Lewis did not deliver himself up for examination or comply with said recognizance.

At the trial the defendants offered to show that on or about March 15, 1872, said Downing, with his wife, made a mortgage to said Way on a dwelling-house in Boston, to secure...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Compton v. Jesup
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • April 2, 1895
    ... ... Phelps, 1 Har. & G. 492, ... 503. Other illustrations of the same principle may be found ... in Candee v. Lord, 2 N.Y. 269; Raymond v ... Richmond, 78 N.Y. 351; Pray v. Hegeman, 98 N.Y ... 351; Curtis v. Leavitt, 15 N.Y. 51; Hall v ... Stryker, 27 N.Y. 596; Way v. Lewis, 115 Mass ... 26; Swihart v. Shaum, 24 Ohio St. 432; Wingate ... v. Haywood, 40 N.H. 437; Inman v. Mead, 97 ... Mass. 310; Brigham v. Fayerweather, 140 Mass. 411, ... 413, 5 N.E. 265; Cincinnati v. Deikmeier, 31 Ohio ... St. 242. In other words, if the mortgagor railroad company ... ...
  • Everett v. Henderson
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 10, 1888
    ...27; Downs v. Fuller, 2 Metc. 135; Laflin v. Field, 6 Metc. 287; Tracy v. Goodwin, 5 Allen, 409; Tracy v. Maloney, 105 Mass. 90; Way v. Lewis, 115 Mass. 26; Cutler Evans, 115 Mass. 27; Prichard v. Farrar, 116 Mass. 221; Robinson v. Hodge, 117 Mass. 222; Edson v. Edson, 108 Mass. 590. The def......
  • Giatas v. DeMoulas
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • March 26, 1930
    ...to the sureties and not adjudicated thereby. See Heard v. Lodge, 20 Pick. 53, 58,32 Am. Dec. 197;Tracy v. Goodwin, 5 Allen, 409;Way v. Lewis, 115 Mass. 26;Curtiss v. Curtiss, 182 Mass. 104, 66 N. E. 635;Ruggles v. Bernstein, 188 Mass. 232, 74 N. E. 366. The evidence offered bore upon such d......
  • McKim v. Glover (In re Appeal of Glover)
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • January 8, 1897
    ...v. Mercer, 44 Ohio St. 339, 7 N.E. 155;Holden v. Lathrop, 65 Mich. 652, 32 N.W. 879. See, also, Tracy v. Goodwin, 5 Allen, 409;Way v. Lewis, 115 Mass. 26;Tracy v. Maloney, 105 Mass. 90;Cutter v. Evans, 115 Mass. 27. On this ground, as well as the other, the exceptions to the master's report......
  • Get Started for Free