Weatherly v. Hunter
| Decision Date | 26 June 1987 |
| Citation | 510 So.2d 151 |
| Parties | Paul B. WEATHERLY, Sr. v. Frank HUNTER. 85-1352. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Edward F. Morgan, Tuscaloosa, for appellant.
Clark Summerford, of Zeanah, Hust & Summerford, Tuscaloosa, for appellee.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant Frank Hunter entered pursuant to a verdict directed by the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County. The plaintiff, Paul B. Weatherly, Sr., filed a complaint against Christy LaShan White and Frank Hunter, charging that the defendants caused personal injury to Weatherly by their combined and concurring negligence or wantonness. The plaintiff reached a settlement with White prior to trial, and his claim against Hunter was tried before a jury. After all evidence had been heard, the trial court directed a verdict for defendant Hunter on the plaintiff's wantonness claim. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Hunter on the plaintiff's negligence claim. The plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by directing a verdict for the defendant on the claim of wantonness and in denying his motion for a new trial. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The facts reveal that Weatherly was involved in two automobile accidents on May 6, 1983; the first, a collision with a vehicle driven by Christy LaShan White, and the second, moments later, when Weatherly's truck was struck by a truck driven by defendant Frank Hunter. After the collision with White, Weatherly's truck was stopped while both White and Weatherly waited for the police to arrive. Hunter, who was traveling east on Skyland Boulevard in Tuscaloosa at approximately 40 miles per hour, looked to his left at the White vehicle, which was wrecked and stopped on the median. When he looked back to the roadway, he testified, he saw the Weatherly truck stopped off the roadway but saw that the rear corner of the vehicle extended two to two-and-one-half feet onto Skyland Boulevard. Hunter's truck struck the left rear corner of Weatherly's truck, and Weatherly alleges that he was injured when he dove out of the path of Hunter's truck to avoid being struck. Weatherly claimed that no part of his truck was on the roadway at the time it was struck by Hunter's truck.
This Court has held previously:
"Wanton conduct" is the doing of some act or something with reckless indifference to the consequences of said act, or it is a failure or omission to do something, with reckless indifference to the consequences of such failure or omission, that is, that the party acting or failing to act is conscious of his conduct, and even though without any actual intent to injure is aware from his knowledge of existing circumstances and conditions that his conduct would probably result in injury to another or in damage to his property.
W.T. Ratliff Co. v. Purvis, 292 Ala. 171, 291 So.2d 289 (1974). The appellant alleges that Mr. Hunter knowingly entered an area of Skyland Boulevard with an awareness that a wreck had occurred. Testimony was presented at trial that Mr. Hunter turned to look at Ms. White's damaged automobile which was stopped on the median of Skyland Boulevard after her collision with the appellant. When his attention returned to the roadway ahead of him, Mr. Hunter testified, he was too near to the Weatherly vehicle to avoid a collision. He testified that he did not swerve left because he feared he might hit a car traveling in the left lane of the divided highway. Hunter asserted the affirmative defense that Weatherly was contributorily negligent in leaving his truck parked partially on the roadway, an allegation Weatherly denied. The jury returned a verdict for Hunter on Weatherly's allegation of negligence.
We are asked here to rule that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for defendant Hunter on the allegation of wantonness. Weatherly argues that Hunter was familiar with...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Southland Bank v. A & a Drywall Supply
...and conditions that his conduct would probably result in injury to another or in damage to his property."' "Weatherly v. Hunter, 510 So.2d 151, 152 (Ala.1987), quoting W.T. Ratliff Co. v. Purvis, 292 Ala. 171, 291 So.2d 289 Armstrong, 817 So.2d at 679-80. We held that AmSouth owed no contra......
-
Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth Bank
...and conditions that his conduct would probably result in injury to another or in damage to his property.'" Weatherly v. Hunter, 510 So.2d 151, 152 (Ala.1987), quoting W.T. Ratliff Co. v. Purvis, 292 Ala. 171, 291 So.2d 289 As with the issues addressed earlier, we focus first on the trial co......
-
The Utils. Bd. of Tuskegee v. 3M Co.
...result in injury to another.” Armstrong Bus. Servs., Inc. v. AmSouth Bank, 817 So.2d 665, 680 (Ala. 2001) (quoting Weatherly v. Hunter, 510 So.2d 151, 152 (Ala. 1987) (internal quotations omitted). “[I]t is not that the actor know that a person is within the zone made dangerous by his condu......
-
Pardue v. City Of Saraland
...and conditions that his conduct would probably result in injury to another or in damage to his property.'"Weatherly v. Hunter, 510 So.2d 151, 152 (Ala. 1987)(quoting W.T. Ratliff Co. v. Purvis, 291 So.2d 289 (Ala. 1974)). After a review of the record in a light most favorable to the plainti......