Weaver v. State
Decision Date | 06 February 1968 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 334 |
Parties | Harvey WEAVER v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Geo. C. Brassell, Montgomery, for appellant.
MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Paul T. Gish, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
This is a direct appeal from a judgment based on a plea of guilty to escape from the penitentiary. Code 1940, T. 14, § 153, as amended reads:
Thus Weaver could have been sentenced to as little as twelve months (or certainly one year and a day) more in the penitentiary. 1 Or he could have been sentenced to a longer term up to and including life.
The judgment entry reads:
Incorporated in this record is a court reporter's transcription of the trial judge's enquiry into Weaver's understanding of the effect of the pleas of guilty--and of not guilty:
We hold that on the instant record Weaver's plea of guilty was coerced.
Aside from whatever intendment is to be accorded to the reference to the least punishment as being 'thirteen months,' certainly the italicized language shows a prejudgment prima facie working as a penalty for pleading not guilty.
In 1926 at the apogee of the Nine Old Men, the Supreme Court of the United States, per Mr. Justice Butler, said in Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220, 223, 47 S.Ct. 582, 583, 71 L.Ed. 1009:
* * *'
In Howard, 280 Ala. 430, 194 So.2d 834, we find:
* * *'
Counsel in brief claims that a second trial after coram nobis relief via Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, is double jeopardy. This contention we discussed in Goolsby (6 Div. 202, Ms., Nov. 28, 1967, on cert. in Sup.Ct. of Ala.). There we stated:
'When a defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, he implicitly agrees in case of reversal to return to the stage of proceedings at which the reversible error occurred. A trial, after issue is joined, is of necessity treated as an indivisible unit.
'Hence, for error during trial the former jurors are not called back and testimony begun anew, rather we have a new writ, venire facias de...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alexander v. State, 8 Div. 81
...would constitute coercion and thus require reversal if true. Kelly v. State, 44 Ala.App. 307, 208 So.2d 217 (1968); Weaver v. State, 44 Ala.App. 268, 207 So.2d 134 (1968). However, appellant's attorney testified that no such statements were made by the trial judge, and we have carefully sea......
-
Kelly v. State, 3 Div. 333
...verity raises the judgment entry above the evidence transcript, yet we consider this cause is due to be reversed. In Weaver v. State, Ala.App., 207 So.2d 134 (Feb. 6, 1968), we said of a similar address of the court to the accused: 'We hold that on the instant record Weaver's plea of guilty......
-
Jacques v. State
...§ 13-5-63 and § 13-5-68. The maximum, though not expressly stated in § 13-5-65 is a "term up to and including life." Weaver v. State, 44 Ala.App. 268, 207 So.2d 134 (1968); Kelly v. State, 44 Ala.App. 307, 208 So.2d 217 (1968). It is to be noted that the new criminal code, Code of Alabama 1......
-
Behel v. State, 8 Div. 285
...for which he was sentenced, shall on conviction, be imprisoned for an additional term of not less than one year." In Weaver v. State, 44 Ala.App. 268, 207 So.2d 134, this court, interpreting the above statute, stated that a prisoner convicted for escape "could have been sentenced to as litt......